Publication:
Linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for vestibular schwannomas: Comparative observations of 139 patients treated at a single institution

dc.contributor.authorPutipun Puataweepongen_US
dc.contributor.authorMantana Dhanachaien_US
dc.contributor.authorSomjai Dangpraserten_US
dc.contributor.authorLadawan Narkwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorChomporn Sitathaneeen_US
dc.contributor.authorThiti Sawangsilpaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTaweesak Janwityanujiten_US
dc.contributor.authorPornpan Yongvithisatiden_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-09T02:19:09Z
dc.date.available2018-11-09T02:19:09Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractStereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) have been recognized as an alternative to surgery for small to medium sized vestibular schwannoma (VS). This study analysed and compared the outcomes of VS treated with the first Thailand installation of a dedicated Linac-based stereotactic radiation machine using single-fraction radiosurgery (SRS), hypofraction stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) and conventional fraction stereotactic radiotherapy (CSRT). From 1997 to 2010, a total of 139 consecutive patients with 146 lesions of VS were treated with X-Knife at Ramathibodi hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. SRS was selected for 39 lesions (in patients with small tumors ≤3 cm and non-serviceable hearing function), whereas HSRT (79 lesions) and CSRT (28 lesions) were given for the remaining lesions that were not suitable for SRS. With a median follow-up time of 61 months (range, 12-143), the 5-year local control rate was 95, 100 and 95% in the SRS, HSRT and CSRT groups, respectively. Hearing preservation was observed after SRS in 75%, after HSRT in 87% and after CSRT in 63% of the patients. Cranial nerve complications were low in all groups. There were no statistically significant differences in local control, hearing preservation or complication between the treatment schedules. In view of our results, it may be preferable to use HSRT over CSRT for patients with serviceable hearing because of the shorter duration of treatment. © 2013 The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Radiation Research. Vol.55, No.2 (2014), 351-358en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jrr/rrt121en_US
dc.identifier.issn13499157en_US
dc.identifier.issn04493060en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84898931398en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/33923
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84898931398&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectPhysics and Astronomyen_US
dc.titleLinac-based stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for vestibular schwannomas: Comparative observations of 139 patients treated at a single institutionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84898931398&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections