Publication:
Comparison of storage methods to preserve the pathogenic oomycete pythium insidiosum

dc.contributor.authorTassanee Lohnooen_US
dc.contributor.authorWanta Yingyongen_US
dc.contributor.authorNujarin Jongrujaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTheerapong Krajaejunen_US
dc.contributor.otherKing Mongkuts University of Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-28T06:10:58Z
dc.date.available2019-08-28T06:10:58Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 SEAMEO TROPMED Network. All rights reserved. Pythium insidiosum causes life-threatening pythiosis in humans and other animals. Study of this organism requires maintaining it in culture which can be difficult. The aim of this study was to compare several methods of maintaining P. insidiosum in cultures in order to determine the best method to accomplish this. We compared the following methods for maintaining P. insidiosum: routine repeated subculture, distilled water immersion, liquid paraffin overlay and storage at an ultra-low temperature with liquid nitrogen. Ribosomal deoxyribonucleic acid (rDNA) sequences of P. insidiosum were analyzed to confirm the identity of the organism after preservation. We conducted an initial 2-week assessment but due to relatively low viability with storage at an ultra-low temperature with liquid nitrogen, this method was not used for the long term study. The remaining methods were reassessed every 3 months for 15 months. The routine repeated subculture, distilled water immersion and liquid paraffin overlay methods showed the viability rates of 100%, 100% and 90% at 9 months, 100%, 90% and 80% at 12 months and 100%, 60% and 40% at 15 months, respectively. The rDNA sequences of the preserved strains showed no differences compared to the original strains. We conclude the distilled water immersion method is optimal due to being simple to perform, inexpensive and relatively efficient for maintaining P. insidiosum for at least 9 months. This method reduces the frequency of routine repeated subculture passages by 9 fold.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSoutheast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. Vol.49, No.3 (2018), 421-427en_US
dc.identifier.issn01251562en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85055045737en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/46705
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85055045737&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleComparison of storage methods to preserve the pathogenic oomycete pythium insidiosumen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85055045737&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections