Publication: Analysis of survival for patients with chronic kidney disease primarily related to renal cancer surgery
Issued Date
2018-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
1464410X
14644096
14644096
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85029231245
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
BJU International. Vol.121, No.1 (2018), 93-100
Suggested Citation
Jitao Wu, Chalairat Suk-Ouichai, Wen Dong, Elvis Caraballo Antonio, Ithaar H. Derweesh, Brian R. Lane, Sevag Demirjian, Jianbo Li, Steven C. Campbell Analysis of survival for patients with chronic kidney disease primarily related to renal cancer surgery. BJU International. Vol.121, No.1 (2018), 93-100. doi:10.1111/bju.13994 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/47235
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Analysis of survival for patients with chronic kidney disease primarily related to renal cancer surgery
Abstract
© 2017 The Authors BJU International © 2017 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd Objectives: To evaluate predictors of long-term survival for patients with chronic kidney disease primarily due to surgery (CKD-S). Patients with CKD-S have generally good survival that approximates patients who do not have CKD even after renal cancer surgery (RCS), yet there may be heterogeneity within this cohort. Patients and Methods: From 1997 to 2008, 4 246 patients underwent RCS at our centre. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up was 9.4 (7.3–11.0) years. New baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was defined as highest GFR between nadir and 6 weeks after RCS. We retrospectively evaluated three cohorts: no-CKD (new baseline GFR of ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ); CKD-S (new baseline GFR of <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 but preoperative GFR of ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ); and CKD due to medical aetiologies who then require RCS (CKD-M/S, preoperative and new baseline GFR both <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ). Analysis focused primarily on non-renal cancer-related survival (NRCRS) for the CKD-S cohort. Kaplan–Meier analysis assessed the longitudinal impact of new baseline GFR (45–60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 vs <45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) and Cox regression evaluated relative impact of preoperative GFR, new baseline GFR, and relevant demographics/comorbidities. Results: Of the 4 246 patients who underwent RCS, 931 had CKD-S and 1 113 had CKD-M/S, whilst 2 202 had no-CKD even after RCS. Partial/radical nephrectomy (PN/RN) was performed in 54%/46% of the patients, respectively. For CKD-S, 641 patients had a new baseline GFR of 45–60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 and 290 had a new baseline GFR of <45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Kaplan–Meier analysis showed significantly reduced NRCRS for patients with CKD-S with a GFR of <45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 compared to those with no-CKD or CKD-S with a GFR of 45–60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (both P ≤ 0.004), and competing risk analysis confirmed this (P < 0.001). Age, gender, heart disease, and new baseline GFR were all associated independently with NRCRS for patients with CKD-S (all P ≤ 0.02). Conclusion: Our data suggest that CKD-S is heterogeneous, and patients with a reduced new baseline GFR have compromised survival, particularly if <45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Our findings may have implications regarding choice of PN/RN in patients at risk of developing CKD-S.