Publication:
Community engagement, social context and coverage of mass anti-malarial administration: Comparative findings from multi-site research in the Greater Mekong sub-Region

dc.contributor.authorChristopher L. Pellen_US
dc.contributor.authorBipin Adhikarien_US
dc.contributor.authorMay Myo Thwinen_US
dc.contributor.authorLadda Kajeechiwaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuphak Nostenen_US
dc.contributor.authorFrancois H. Nostenen_US
dc.contributor.authorKate M. Sahanen_US
dc.contributor.authorFrank M. Smithuisen_US
dc.contributor.authorThuy Nhien Nguyenen_US
dc.contributor.authorTran Tinh Hienen_US
dc.contributor.authorRupam Tripuraen_US
dc.contributor.authorThomas J. Petoen_US
dc.contributor.authorNou Sanannen_US
dc.contributor.authorChea Nguonen_US
dc.contributor.authorTiengkham Pongvongsaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKoukeo Phommasoneen_US
dc.contributor.authorMayfong Mayxayen_US
dc.contributor.authorMavuto Mukakaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPimnara Peerawaranunen_US
dc.contributor.authorNils Kaehleren_US
dc.contributor.authorPhaik Yeong Cheahen_US
dc.contributor.authorNicholas P.J. Dayen_US
dc.contributor.authorNicholas J. Whiteen_US
dc.contributor.authorArjen M. Dondorpen_US
dc.contributor.authorLorenz von Seidleinen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Oxforden_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversiteit van Amsterdamen_US
dc.contributor.otherSorbonne Universiteen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Health Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.otherMedical Action Myanmaren_US
dc.contributor.otherLao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit (LOMWRU)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMyanmar Oxford Clinical Research Uniten_US
dc.contributor.otherSavannakhet Provincial Health Departmenten_US
dc.contributor.otherAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development (AIGHD)en_US
dc.contributor.otherNational Center for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Controlen_US
dc.contributor.otherOxford University Clinical Research Uniten_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T07:25:33Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T07:25:33Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019 Pell et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Background Between 2013 and 2017, targeted malaria elimination (TME), a package of interventions that includes mass drug administration (MDA)–was piloted in communities with reservoirs of asymptomatic P. falciparum across the Greater Mekong sub-Region (GMS). Coverage in target communities is a key determinant of the effectiveness of MDA. Drawing on mixed methods research conducted alongside TME pilot studies, this article examines the impact of the community engagement, local social context and study design on MDA coverage. Methods and findings Qualitative and quantitative data were collected using questionnaire-based surveys, semi-structured and in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, informal conversations, and observations of study activities. Over 1500 respondents were interviewed in Myanmar, Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos. Interview topics included attitudes to malaria and experiences of MDA. Overall coverage of mass anti-malarial administration was high, particularly participation in at least a single round (85%). Familiarity with and concern about malaria prompted participation in MDA; as did awareness of MDA and familiarity with the aim of eliminating malaria. Fear of adverse events and blood draws discouraged people. Hence, community engagement activities sought to address these concerns but their impact was mediated by the trust relationships that study staff could engender in communities. In contexts of weak healthcare infrastructure and (cash) poverty, communities valued the study’s ancillary care and the financial compensation. However, coverage did not necessarily decrease in the absence of cash compensation. Community dynamics, affected by politics, village conformity, and household decision-making also affected coverage. Conclusions The experimental nature of TME presented particular challenges to achieving high coverage. Nonetheless, the findings reflect those from studies of MDA under implementation conditions and offer useful guidance for potential regional roll-out of MDA: it is key to understand target communities and provide appropriate information in tailored ways, using community engagement that engenders trust.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE. Vol.14, No.3 (2019)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0214280en_US
dc.identifier.issn19326203en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85063428601en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/49808
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85063428601&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.titleCommunity engagement, social context and coverage of mass anti-malarial administration: Comparative findings from multi-site research in the Greater Mekong sub-Regionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85063428601&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections