Publication:
Comparative analysis of a Thai congenital-Zika-syndrome-associated virus with a Thai Zika-fever-associated virus

dc.contributor.authorAnusara Jitsatjaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuwipa Ramphanen_US
dc.contributor.authorPloenphit Prommaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAtichat Kuadkitkanen_US
dc.contributor.authorNitwara Wikanen_US
dc.contributor.authorMongkol Uiprasertkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorChayawat Phatihattakornen_US
dc.contributor.authorDuncan R. Smithen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-25T10:02:54Z
dc.date.available2020-08-25T10:02:54Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature. In this study, we compared the characteristics of two strains of Zika virus (ZIKV) isolated in Thailand, one isolated from a febrile patient and one isolated from tissues of a fetus medically terminated due to congenital Zika syndrome (CZS). Replication profiles showed that the isolate from the fetal tissues replicated significantly more slowly than the fever-associated isolate in human lung A549 cells during the first 24 hours postinfection but showed a similar growth profile over longer-term infection. A much smaller difference was observed in Aedes albopictus C6/36 cells. In a quasispecies analysis, a high proportion (approximately 20%) of nonfunctional genomes was identified, caused by an adenine insertion in the prM gene. This insertion was found to be present in two Thai fever strains and as such may represent a common feature of Thai endemic ZIKV. Comparison between viral RNA copy number and viral titer showed that the isolate from fetal tissues was produced more efficiently than the fever-associated isolate. Together, these results suggest that different ZIKV isolates differ in their replication capacity, and this might contribute to the fetotropic potential of a particular strain.en_US
dc.identifier.citationArchives of Virology. Vol.165, No.8 (2020), 1791-1801en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00705-020-04667-7en_US
dc.identifier.issn14328798en_US
dc.identifier.issn03048608en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85085901487en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/57941
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85085901487&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.titleComparative analysis of a Thai congenital-Zika-syndrome-associated virus with a Thai Zika-fever-associated virusen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85085901487&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections