Publication:
Comparison of three antigen preparations to detect trichinellosis in live swine using IgG-ELISA

dc.contributor.authorMuncharee Tattiyapongen_US
dc.contributor.authorUrai Chaisrien_US
dc.contributor.authorMontakan Vongpakornen_US
dc.contributor.authorMalinee T. Anantaphrutien_US
dc.contributor.authorParon Dekumyoyen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherThailand National Institute of Animal Healthen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-03T08:21:56Z
dc.date.available2018-05-03T08:21:56Z
dc.date.issued2011-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstractA swine infected with Trichinella spiralis is a source of transmission to human through consumption of raw or improperly cooked pork. Detection of larvae is suitable for carcasses, so that pigs in households or farms can be examined serologically for trichinellosis. This study compared antigens, crude (CAg), excretory-secretory (ESAg) and surface (SAg), for their potential use in IgG-ELISA. Serum samples were collected from 5 experimentally infected swine with T. spiralis (pTs), 147 positive cases of 9 other parasitic infections, 12 mixed infections of other parasites, and 35 normal controls. At the same 100% sensitivity, specificity of tests was in a range of 98-77%. ESAg was the best source of antigen with specificity of 98.3% at cut-off value of 0.439. False positives included coccidiasis (1/86) and mixed infections (2/39). For CAg, trichuriasis (2/11), coccidiasis (5/86), and mixed infections (8/39) gave cross-reactions and some of these samples had OD values far above cut-off value of 0.332. Cross-reactions of SAg were Oesophagostomum spp-like GI-nematode infection (1/1), unidentified GI-nematode infections (2/3), trichuriasis (5/11), coccidiasis (29/86) and mixed infections (4/39). Thus, ESAg has the highest potential in serodiagnosis, with antibody to T. spiralis in pigs being detected at the earliest 16 day post-infection. However, crude antigen demonstrated a good specificity at 91.8%, and this antigen has a potential to be used as a detection of choice for swine trichinellosis, but the antigen preparation must be improved for higher specificity.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSoutheast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. Vol.42, No.6 (2011), 1339-1350en_US
dc.identifier.issn01251562en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84857665803en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/12201
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84857665803&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleComparison of three antigen preparations to detect trichinellosis in live swine using IgG-ELISAen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84857665803&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections