Publication:
Sleep disturbances compared to traditional risk factors for diabetes development: Systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorThunyarat Anothaisintaweeen_US
dc.contributor.authorSirimon Reutrakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorEve Van Cauteren_US
dc.contributor.authorAmmarin Thakkinstianen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Chicagoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T03:15:38Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:01:55Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T03:15:38Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:01:55Z
dc.date.issued2016-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. Sleep disturbances [short (<6 h) and long (>8 h) sleeping time, insomnia (initiating or maintaining sleep), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and abnormal sleep timing] have been associated with increased diabetes risk but the effect size relative to that of traditional risk factors is unknown. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the risk associated with sleep disturbances to traditional risk factors. Studies were identified from Medline and Scopus. Cohort studies measuring the association between sleep disturbances and incident diabetes were eligible. For traditional risk factors (i.e., overweight, family history, and physical inactivity), systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis were included. Thirty-six studies (1,061,555 participants) were included. Pooled relative risks (RRs) of sleep variables were estimated using a random-effect model. Pooled RRs of sleeping ≤5 h, 6 h, and ≥9 h/d were respectively 1.48 (95%CI:1.25,1.76), 1.18 (1.10,1.26) and 1.36 (1.12,1.65). Poor sleep quality, OSA and shift work were associated with diabetes with a pooled RR of 1.40 (1.21,1.63), 2.02 (1.57, 2.61) and 1.40 (1.18,1.66), respectively. The pooled RRs of being overweight, having a family history of diabetes, and being physically inactive were 2.99 (2.42,3.72), 2.33 (1.79,2.79), and 1.20 (1.11,1.32), respectively. In conclusion, the risk of developing diabetes associated with sleep disturbances is comparable to that of traditional risk factors. Sleep disturbances should be considered in clinical guidelines for type 2 diabetes screening.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSleep Medicine Reviews. Vol.30, (2016), 11-24en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.smrv.2015.10.002en_US
dc.identifier.issn15322955en_US
dc.identifier.issn10870792en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84949571275en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/40988
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84949571275&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleSleep disturbances compared to traditional risk factors for diabetes development: Systematic review and meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84949571275&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections