Publication:
The efficacy and safety of 0.5% Levofloxacin versus fortified Cefazolin and Amikacin ophthalmic solution for the treatment of suspected and culture-proven cases of infectious bacterial keratitis: A comparative study

dc.contributor.authorNgamjit Kasetsuwanen_US
dc.contributor.authorPinnita Tanthuvaniten_US
dc.contributor.authorUsanee Reinprayoonen_US
dc.contributor.otherChulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Chulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-03T08:04:02Z
dc.date.available2018-05-03T08:04:02Z
dc.date.issued2011-02-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Bacterial keratitis is a major devastating ocular condition that quickly deteriorates the patient's vision. Vigorous and prompt treatment of bacterial keratitis with broad-spectrum antibiotic eye-drops is preferred. Objective: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of 0.5% Levofloxacin for the treatment of suspected and culture-proven cases of infectious bacterial keratitis in comparison to fortified Cefazolin and Amikacin ophthalmic solution. Materials and methods: Seventy-one eyes from 69 patients suspected of having infectious bacterial keratitis were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized into two arms, 0.5% Levofloxacin eye drops (34 eyes) or fortified Cefazolin and Amikacin (37 eyes). Sixty-eight eyes were included in the efficacy analysis. During treatment, on days 2, 7, 14, and 21, the patient's symptoms and signs were scored from grade 0-3 (absent to severe). Results: At the end of the treatment, 61 out of 71 eyes completely healed. The resolution of the keratitis was not significantly different between both groups. There were no significant differences in the mean time-duration for the ulcer to heal or for the symptoms and clinical signs to disappear between the two groups. No serious adverse events or side effects from the disease were found. The patients compliance was 80% based on the self-reported diaries. Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of 0.5% topical Levofloxacin was comparable to fortified Cefazolin and Amikacin for the treatment of mild-to-moderate bacterial keratitis. Topical Levofloxacin is far superior because of its availability and patient compliance when used as monotherapy for the treatment of infectious bacterial keratitis.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAsian Biomedicine. Vol.5, No.1 (2011), 77-83en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5372/1905-7415.0501.009en_US
dc.identifier.issn1875855Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn19057415en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84871532877en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/11596
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84871532877&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThe efficacy and safety of 0.5% Levofloxacin versus fortified Cefazolin and Amikacin ophthalmic solution for the treatment of suspected and culture-proven cases of infectious bacterial keratitis: A comparative studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84871532877&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections