Publication:
Pancreatic granular cell tumor diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy

dc.contributor.authorChonlada Krutsrien_US
dc.contributor.authorTomohisa Iwaien_US
dc.contributor.authorMitsuhiro Kidaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHiroshi Imaizumien_US
dc.contributor.authorToshihiro Kawanoen_US
dc.contributor.authorMasayoshi Tadeharaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMasafumi Watanabeen_US
dc.contributor.authorKosuke Okuwakien_US
dc.contributor.authorHiroshi Yamauchien_US
dc.contributor.authorKoizumi Wasaburoen_US
dc.contributor.otherKitasato University Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T09:35:45Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T09:35:45Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-05en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019, Japanese Society of Gastroenterology. Pancreatic granular cell tumors (GCTs) are rare and making an imaging diagnosis of pancreatic GCT is difficult because it has no definite characteristics on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) owing to varying findings. We report about a 32-year-old woman who presented with an incidental finding of a pancreatic tumor with a past history of excision of a right forearm GCT nodule 12 years ago. CE-CT revealed a 23-mm-sized homogeneous low enhancement tumor in the arterial phase in the pancreatic body. Abdominal MRI revealed a lobulated hypointense mass in T1WI and high signal in DWI. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) revealed that the tumor was oval, hypoechoic with posterior echo enhancement, and had a well-defined border. Although EUS-guided fine needle aspiration revealed benign granular cells of the pancreas, she underwent laparoscopic surgery because the metastatic tumor from the past lesion was not excluded. The pathological finding was benign GCT of the pancreas and it was considered as an original lesion. In the previous reports, most of the resected cases were considered to be pancreatic cancer or neuroendocrine tumor preoperatively. Compared to CE-CT and MRI, EUS imaging and EUS-FNA are more reliable diagnosis tools for pancreatic GCT. Although malignant GCT accounts for approximately 1–2% of all cases, surgical resection or strict follow-up should be considered because it is difficult to predict its biological behavior.en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Journal of Gastroenterology. Vol.12, No.4 (2019), 347-354en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12328-019-00941-7en_US
dc.identifier.issn18657265en_US
dc.identifier.issn18657257en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85061295943en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/51470
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85061295943&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titlePancreatic granular cell tumor diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85061295943&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections