Publication:
Tuberculosis case finding: Supplement intensified case finding among acute lower respiratory infection (ALRI) hospitalized patients in Sa Kaeo province, Thailand

dc.contributor.authorSathapana Naowaraten_US
dc.contributor.authorChanapong Rojanaworariten_US
dc.contributor.authorWanwimon Surinsaken_US
dc.contributor.authorKanjana Umainen_US
dc.contributor.authorDara Ruadreawen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomkid Yuenprakoneen_US
dc.contributor.authorApirak Pisutapornen_US
dc.contributor.authorArongrag C. Meeyaien_US
dc.contributor.otherThailand Ministry of Public Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T09:37:17Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T09:37:17Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Formosan Medical Association Background and purpose: We aimed to estimate TB prevalence among in-patients hospitalized with acute lower respiratory infection (ALRI) through a routine TB case finding approach (Patient-Initiated-Pathway, PIP) and among those without initial TB detection by PIP using a supplementary-Intensified-Case-Finding (supplementary-ICF) approach to determine the extent of active TB infection in patients enrolled in population-based surveillance in Sa Keao, Thailand. We also investigated secondary TB transmission through household contacts (HHCs). Methods: This was a prospective cross-sectional study. Data for hospitalized patients with ALRI were obtained from population-based pneumonia surveillance. PIP was provided in ALRI patients with suspected TB infection; those without initial suspicion of TB infection were evaluated for TB by the supplementary-ICF approach. For each active TB case finding approach, index cases were identified by acid-fast-bacillus testing and the TB prevalence was estimated. HHCs of each TB index case were followed to identify the extent of secondary TB infection. Results: TB prevalence among ALRI hospitalized patients was 12.2% among those undergoing PIP and 6.8% among those undergoing supplementary-ICF. The total number of active TB cases was doubled after implementing the supplementary-ICF method. Secondary TB infection among HHCs was 3.5 times more common for contacts of index cases identified by routine active TB case finding compared to supplementary-ICF TB. Conclusion: Supplementary-ICF among ALRI hospitalizations would be expected to result in improved active TB case detection compared to the current policy of PIP. The supplementary-ICF also enhanced early case detection and showed lower prevalence of secondary infection.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Formosan Medical Association. Vol.118, No.8 (2019), 1255-1265en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jfma.2018.11.016en_US
dc.identifier.issn18760821en_US
dc.identifier.issn09296646en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85059635429en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/51496
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85059635429&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleTuberculosis case finding: Supplement intensified case finding among acute lower respiratory infection (ALRI) hospitalized patients in Sa Kaeo province, Thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85059635429&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections