Publication:
Correlation and variation of cuff inflating volumes and pressures in different adult models of laryngeal mask: A prospective randomized trial

dc.contributor.authorNarut Ruananukunen_US
dc.contributor.authorJittiya Watcharotayangulen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuchaya Jeeranukosolen_US
dc.contributor.authorRojnarin Komonhirunen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-02T04:54:44Z
dc.date.available2020-06-02T04:54:44Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-07en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020 The Author(s). Background: Hyperinflation of laryngeal mask cuffs may carry the risk of airway complications. The manufacturer recommends inflating cuff until the intracuff pressure reaches 60 cmH2O, or inflate with the volume of air to not exceed the maximum recommended volume. We prospectively assessed the correlation of cuff inflating volumes and pressures, and the appropriated the cuff inflating volumes to generate an intracuff pressure of 60 cmH2O in the adult laryngeal masks from different manufacturers. Methods: Two groups of 80 patients requiring laryngeal mask size 3 and 4 during general anesthesia were randomized into 4 subgroups for each size of the laryngeal mask: Soft Seal® (Portex®), AuraOnce™ (Ambu®), LMA-Classic™ (Teleflex®) and LMA-ProSeal™ (Teleflex®). After insertion, the cuff was inflated with 5-ml increments of air up to the maximum recommended volume. After each 5-ml intracuff pressure was measured, the volume of air that generated the intracuff pressure of 60 cmH2O was recorded. Results: Mean (SD) volume of air required to achieve the intracuff pressure of 60 cmH2O in Soft Seal®, AuraOnce™, LMA-Classic™, LMA-ProSeal™ laryngeal mask size 3 were 11.80(1.88), 9.20(1.88), 8.95(1.50) and 13.50(2.48) ml, respectively, and these volumes in laryngeal mask size 4 were 14.45(4.12), 12.55(1.85), 11.30(1.95) and 18.20(3.47) ml, respectively. The maximum recommended volume resulted in high intracuff pressures (> 60 cmH2O) in all laryngeal mask types and sizes studied. Conclusion: Pressure-volume curves of adult laryngeal masks are all in sigmoidal shape. Cuff designs and materials can effect pressure and volume correlation. Approximately half of the maximum recommended volume is required to achieve the intracuff pressure of 60 cmH2O except LMA-ProSeal™ which required two-thirds of the maximum recommended volume. Trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry, TCTR20150602001, May 28, 2015.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMC Anesthesiology. Vol.20, No.1 (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12871-020-01028-4en_US
dc.identifier.issn14712253en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85084407805en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/56237
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85084407805&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleCorrelation and variation of cuff inflating volumes and pressures in different adult models of laryngeal mask: A prospective randomized trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85084407805&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections