Publication: Outcomes of sphincter-saving operation for rectal cancer without protective stoma and pelvic drain, and risk factors for anastomotic leakage
dc.contributor.author | Varut Lohsiriwat | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Darin Lohsiriwat | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wiroon Boonnuch | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Vitoon Chinswangwatanakul | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Thawatchai Akaraviputh | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Woramin Riansuwan | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Narong Lert-Akyamanee | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-07-12T02:40:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-07-12T02:40:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-08-01 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Background/Aims: To evaluate the outcomes of sphincter-saving operation for rectal cancer without protective stoma and pelvic drain and to determine factors influencing anastomotic leakage. Methods: We investigated 170 patients undergoing elective sphincter-saving operation without protective stoma and pelvic drain during 2003-2006 in a single institution. Early postoperative outcomes were evaluated. 17 independent patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related variables were analyzed by a multivariate model to determine their association with anastomotic leakage. Results: The patients' median age was 64 years. Median tumor height was 8 cm (range 3-15) from the anal verge. Overall 30-day mortality rate was 1.2%. Postoperative complications were diagnosed in 38 patients (22%) including 14 cases of anastomotic leakage (8.2%), of which 10 cases (71%) required surgical intervention. Tumor height within 5 cm from the anal verge was the only independent factor for leakage (OR 4.04; 95% CI 1.25-13.08). Conclusion: A sphincter-saving operation without a protective stoma and pelvic drain can be performed safely in the vast majority of rectal cancer patients. Tumor height within 5 cm from the anal verge is an independent risk factor for anastomotic leakage. Thus, the routine use of a protective stoma and pelvic drainage might be unnecessary. Copyright © 2008 S. Karger AG. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Digestive Surgery. Vol.25, No.3 (2008), 191-197 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1159/000140688 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 02534886 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-49449113858 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/19584 | |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | en_US |
dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=49449113858&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.subject | Medicine | en_US |
dc.title | Outcomes of sphincter-saving operation for rectal cancer without protective stoma and pelvic drain, and risk factors for anastomotic leakage | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=49449113858&origin=inward | en_US |