Publication:
The global impact and cost-effectiveness of a melioidosis vaccine

dc.contributor.authorNantasit Luangasanatipen_US
dc.contributor.authorStefan Flascheen_US
dc.contributor.authorDavid A.B. Danceen_US
dc.contributor.authorDirek Limmathurotsakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorBart J. Currieen_US
dc.contributor.authorChiranjay Mukhopadhyayen_US
dc.contributor.authorTim Atkinsen_US
dc.contributor.authorRichard Titballen_US
dc.contributor.authorMark Jiten_US
dc.contributor.otherLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Exeteren_US
dc.contributor.otherDefence Science and Technology Laboratoryen_US
dc.contributor.otherMenzies School of Health Researchen_US
dc.contributor.otherKasturba Medical College, Manipalen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherRoyal Darwin Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherLao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit (LOMWRU)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T09:40:48Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T09:40:48Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-05en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019 The Author(s). Background: Every year, 90,000 people may die from melioidosis. Vaccine candidates have not proceeded past animal studies, partly due to uncertainty around the potential market size. This study aims to estimate the potential impact, cost-effectiveness and market size for melioidosis vaccines. Methods: Age-structured decision tree models with country-specific inputs were used to estimate net costs and health benefits of vaccination, with health measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Four target groups of people living in endemic regions were considered: (i) people aged over 45 years with chronic renal disease, (ii) people aged over 45 years with diabetes, (iii) people aged over 45 years with diabetes and/or chronic renal disease, (iv) everyone aged over 45 years. Melioidosis risk was estimated using Bayesian evidence synthesis of 12 observational studies. In the base case, vaccines were assumed to have 80% efficacy, to have 5-year mean protective duration and to cost USD10.20-338.20 per vaccine. Results: Vaccination could be cost-effective (with incremental cost-effectiveness ratio below GDP per capita) in 61/83 countries/territories with local melioidosis transmission. In these 61 countries/territories, vaccination could avert 68,000 lost QALYs, 8300 cases and 4400 deaths per vaccinated age cohort, at an incremental cost of USD59.6 million. Strategy (ii) was optimal in most regions. The vaccine market may be worth USD268 million per year at its threshold cost-effective price in each country/territory. Conclusions: There is a viable melioidosis vaccine market, with cost-effective vaccine strategies in most countries/territories with local transmission.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMC Medicine. Vol.17, No.1 (2019)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12916-019-1358-xen_US
dc.identifier.issn17417015en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85068584292en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/51537
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85068584292&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThe global impact and cost-effectiveness of a melioidosis vaccineen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85068584292&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections