Publication:
Efficacy and safety of daylight photodynamic therapy after tailored pretreatment with ablative fractional laser or microdermabrasion: a randomized, side-by-side, single-blind trial in patients with actinic keratosis and large-area field cancerization

dc.contributor.authorE. Wenandeen_US
dc.contributor.authorW. Phothongen_US
dc.contributor.authorC. Bayen_US
dc.contributor.authorK. E. Karmisholten_US
dc.contributor.authorM. Haedersdalen_US
dc.contributor.authorK. Togsverd-Boen_US
dc.contributor.otherBispebjerg Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T09:58:25Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T09:58:25Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 British Association of Dermatologists Background: Physical pretreatments can potentiate the efficacy of daylight photodynamic therapy (dPDT), but clinical comparative studies remain limited. Objectives: Performed in large skin areas with actinic keratoses (AKs) and photodamage, this blinded, randomized clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of dPDT after tailored skin pretreatment using ablative fractional laser (AFL) or microdermabrasion (MD). Methods: Two ≥ 50-cm 2 side-by-side skin areas were randomized to receive a single treatment with AFL-dPDT or MD-dPDT. Pretreatment parameters were tailored according to AK grade and skin constitution to ensure standardized immediate end points. Subsequently, methyl aminolaevulinate was applied, followed by 2-h daylight exposure. The primary outcome comprised blinded assessment of AK clearance at the 3-month follow-up. Results: In 18 patients with 832 AKs, AFL-dPDT provided significantly higher AK clearance (81% vs. 60%, P < 0·001), led to fewer new AKs (P < 0·001) and showed superior improvement in dyspigmentation (P = 0·003) and skin texture (P = 0·001) vs. MD-dPDT. Peaking at days 3–6, AFL-PDT induced more intensified local skin responses (P = 0·004), including instances of Staphylococcus aureus infection (n = 3). Patients nonetheless preferred AFL-dPDT (P = 0·077), due to lower pretreatment-related pain (P = 0·002) and superior cosmesis (P = 0·035) and efficacy compared with MD-dPDT. Conclusions: AFL-dPDT is an effective treatment for patients with AK with extensive field cancerization, although AFL pretreatment is associated with intensified local skin reactions.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Dermatology. Vol.180, No.4 (2019), 756-764en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/bjd.17096en_US
dc.identifier.issn13652133en_US
dc.identifier.issn00070963en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85054641759en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/51766
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85054641759&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEfficacy and safety of daylight photodynamic therapy after tailored pretreatment with ablative fractional laser or microdermabrasion: a randomized, side-by-side, single-blind trial in patients with actinic keratosis and large-area field cancerizationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85054641759&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections