Publication: A biomechanical comparison of 2 femoral fixation techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients: Over-the-top fixation versus transphyseal technique
Issued Date
2011-05-01
Resource Type
ISSN
07498063
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-79954577815
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery. Vol.27, No.5 (2011), 672-680
Suggested Citation
Pisit Lertwanich, Yuki Kato, Cesar A Q Martins, Akira Maeyama, Sheila J M Ingham, Scott Kramer, Monica Linde-Rosen, Patrick Smolinski, Freddie H. Fu A biomechanical comparison of 2 femoral fixation techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients: Over-the-top fixation versus transphyseal technique. Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery. Vol.27, No.5 (2011), 672-680. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2010.12.001 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/12517
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
A biomechanical comparison of 2 femoral fixation techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients: Over-the-top fixation versus transphyseal technique
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare knee kinematics and in situ forces of the graft between 2 femoral fixation techniques of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: the over-the-top (OTT) fixation and transphyseal (TP) techniques. Methods ACL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients is a challenging procedure. Regarding the femoral fixation techniques, 2 methods are commonly used: the OTT fixation and TP techniques. Ten cadaveric knees (mean age, 57 years; rang e, 48 to 65 years) were tested with the robotic/universal force-moment sensor system by use of (1) an 89-N anterior tibial load at full extension and 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion and (2) a combined 7-Nm valgus torque and 5-Nm internal tibial rotation torque at 15° and 30° of knee flexion. Results Both OTT and TP ACL reconstruction techniques closely restored the intact knee kinematics and had a significant reduction in anterior tibial translation under an anterior tibial load and in coupled anterior tibial translation under a combined rotatory load when compared with an ACL-deficient knee. When both ACL reconstruction techniques were compared, the only difference found was that the in situ force of the ACL graft reconstructed with the OTT technique in response to a combined rotatory load at 30° of flexion was significantly lower than the ACL graft reconstructed with the TP technique (5.3 ± 3.3 N and 10.7 ± 6.0 N, respectively; P = .013). Conclusions This time 0 testing showed that both ACL reconstruction techniques, OTT and TP, can reproduce the kinematics of the intact knee in response to an anterior tibial load and a combined rotatory load. Clinical Relevance Both femoral fixation techniques exhibited comparable time 0 kinematics when subjected to simulated clinical examination loading conditions. © 2011 Arthroscopy Association of North America.