Publication: Validity and reliability of smartphone applications for measurement of hip rotation, compared with three‐dimensional motion analysis
Issued Date
2021-12-01
Resource Type
ISSN
14712474
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85100836532
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. Vol.22, No.1 (2021)
Suggested Citation
Phob Ganokroj, Nuchanun Sompornpanich, Pichitpol Kerdsomnuek, Bavornrat Vanadurongwan, Pisit Lertwanich Validity and reliability of smartphone applications for measurement of hip rotation, compared with three‐dimensional motion analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. Vol.22, No.1 (2021). doi:10.1186/s12891-021-03995-2 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77635
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Validity and reliability of smartphone applications for measurement of hip rotation, compared with three‐dimensional motion analysis
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: Measurement of hip rotation is a crucial clinical parameter for the identification of hip problems and the monitoring of symptoms. The objective of this study was to determine whether the use of two smartphone applications is valid and reliable for the measurement of hip rotation. Methods: An experimental, cross-sectional study was undertaken to assess passive hip internal and external rotation in three positions by two examiners. The hip rotational angles were measured by a smartphone clinometer application in the sitting and prone positions, and by a smartphone compass application in the supine position; their results were compared with those of the standard, three-dimensional, motion analysis system. The validities and inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities of the smartphone applications were evaluated. Results: The study involved 24 participants. The validities were good to excellent for the internal rotation angles in all positions (ICC 0.81–0.94), good for the external rotation angles in the prone position (ICC 0.79), and fair for the sitting and supine positions (ICC 0.70–0.73). The measurement of the hip internal rotation in the supine position had the highest ICC value of 0.94 (0.91, 0.96). The two smartphone applications showed good-to-excellent intra-rater reliability, but good-to-excellent inter-rater reliability for only three of the six positions (two other positions had fair reliability, while one position demonstrated poor reliability). Conclusions: The two smartphone applications have good-to-excellent validity and intra-rater reliability, but only fair-to-good inter-rater reliability for the measurement of the hip rotational angle. The most valid hip rotational position in this study was the supine IR angle measurement, while the lowest validity was the ER angle measurement in the sitting position. The smartphone application is one of the practical measurements in hip rotational angles. Trial registration: Number 20181022003 at the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.clinicaltrials.in.th) which was retrospectively registered at 2018-10-18 15:30:29.