Publication:
Clinical study of retrograde filling with gold leaf: Comparison with amalgam

dc.contributor.authorAurasa Waikakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorJirapun Punwutikornen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-10T08:31:37Z
dc.date.available2018-08-10T08:31:37Z
dc.date.issued1991-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractThirty-six patients underwent endodontic surgery involving 66 teeth, with each root canal being retrofilled with either gold leaf or amalgam. A follow-up of most patients was conducted for 6 to 24 months. There was no significant difference in bone healing between the gold leaf-filled and amalgam-filled root cavities (p > 0.05). Gold leaf appeared to be a good alternative retrograde filling material and had a number of benefits over amalgam. © 1991 Mosby-Year Book, Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.citationOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. Vol.71, No.2 (1991), 228-231en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/0030-4220(91)90475-Ren_US
dc.identifier.issn00304220en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-0025735677en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/22031
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0025735677&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectDentistryen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleClinical study of retrograde filling with gold leaf: Comparison with amalgamen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0025735677&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections