Publication:
Determination of optimum exposure parameters for dentoalveolar structures of the jaws using the CB MercuRay system with cluster signal-to-noise analysis

dc.contributor.authorWarangkana Weerawanichen_US
dc.contributor.authorMayumi Shimizuen_US
dc.contributor.authorYohei Takeshitaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKazutoshi Okamuraen_US
dc.contributor.authorShoko Yoshidaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGainer R. Jasaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKazunori Yoshiuraen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de la Republicaen_US
dc.contributor.otherOkayama Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherKyushu University Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherKyushu Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherFukuoka Dental Collegeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T08:26:36Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T08:26:36Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-13en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018, Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. Objective: To determine the optimum cone beam computed tomography exposure parameters for specific diagnostic tasks. Methods: A Teflon phantom attached to a half-mandible in a large container was scanned in dental (D), implant (I), and panoramic (P) modes. An identical phantom in a small container was scanned in D mode. Both were scanned at 60, 80, 100, and 120 kV. We evaluated the image quality of five anatomical structures [dentinoenamel junction (1), lamina dura and periodontal ligament space (2), trabecular pattern (3), cortex–spongy bone junction (4), and pulp chamber and root canal (5)] and analyzed the diagnostic image quality with cluster signal-to-noise analysis. We then evaluated correlations between the two image qualities and calculated the threshold of acceptable diagnostic image quality. Optimum exposure parameters were determined from images with acceptable diagnostic image quality. Results: For the small container, the optimum exposure parameters were D mode, 80 kV for (1), (3), and (4) and D mode, 100 kV for (5). For the large container, they were D mode, 120 kV for (1), (3), and (5) and D mode, 100 kV for (4). I mode, 120 kV reached the acceptable level for (4). No images reached the acceptable level for (2). Conclusions: No optimum exposure parameters were identified for the evaluation of the lamina dura and periodontal ligament space. D mode was sufficient for the other structures; however, the tube voltage required for each structure differed. Smaller patients required lower tube voltage. I mode, 120 kV may be used for larger lesions.en_US
dc.identifier.citationOral Radiology. Vol.35, No.3 (2019), 260-271en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11282-018-0348-6en_US
dc.identifier.issn16139674en_US
dc.identifier.issn09116028en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85053552070en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/50708
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85053552070&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectDentistryen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleDetermination of optimum exposure parameters for dentoalveolar structures of the jaws using the CB MercuRay system with cluster signal-to-noise analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85053552070&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections