Publication:
Misoprostol dose and route after mifepristone for early medical abortion: A randomised controlled noninferiority trial

dc.contributor.authorH. Von Hertzenen_US
dc.contributor.authorN. T.M. Huongen_US
dc.contributor.authorG. Piaggioen_US
dc.contributor.authorM. Bayalagen_US
dc.contributor.authorE. Cabezasen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. H. Fangen_US
dc.contributor.authorK. Gemzell-Danielssonen_US
dc.contributor.authorN. D. Hinhen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Mittalen_US
dc.contributor.authorE. H.Y. Ngen_US
dc.contributor.authorK. Chaturachindaen_US
dc.contributor.authorB. Pinteren_US
dc.contributor.authorL. Puscasiuen_US
dc.contributor.authorL. Savardekaren_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Shenoyen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. Khomassuridgeen_US
dc.contributor.authorH. T.D. Tuyeten_US
dc.contributor.authorA. Velascoen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. Peregoudoven_US
dc.contributor.otherOrganisation Mondiale de la Santeen_US
dc.contributor.otherState Research Centre on Maternal and Child Heathen_US
dc.contributor.otherHospital Docente Gineco-Obstetricoen_US
dc.contributor.otherInternational Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherKarolinska Instituteten_US
dc.contributor.otherNational Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecologyen_US
dc.contributor.otherAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhien_US
dc.contributor.otherQueen Mary Hospital Hong Kongen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniverzitetni Klinicni Center Ljubljanaen_US
dc.contributor.otherCenter of Public Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherNational Institute for Research in Reproductive Health Indiaen_US
dc.contributor.otherMedical College, Thiruvananthapuramen_US
dc.contributor.otherZhordania Institute on Human Reproductionen_US
dc.contributor.otherTu du Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherHospital Clinico Quirurgico Hermanos Ameijeirasen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-24T09:38:56Z
dc.date.available2018-09-24T09:38:56Z
dc.date.issued2010-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective To compare 400 and 800 g sublingual or vaginal misoprostol 24 hours after 200 mg mifepristone for noninferiority regarding efficacy in achieving complete abortion for pregnancy termination up to 63 days of gestation. Design Placebo-controlled, randomised, noninferiority factorial trial, stratified by centre and length of gestation. Misoprostol 400 or 800 g, administered either sublingually or vaginally, with follow up after 2 and 6 weeks. Setting Fifteen obstetricsgynaecology departments in ten countries. Population Pregnant women (n = 3005) up to 63 days of gestation requesting medical abortion. Methods Two-sided 95% CI for differences in failure of complete abortion and continuing pregnancy, with a 3% noninferiority margin, were calculated. Proportions of women with adverse effects were recorded. Outcome measures Complete abortion without surgical intervention (main); continuing live pregnancies, induction-to-abortion interval, adverse effects, women's perceptions (secondary). Results Efficacy outcomes analysed for 2962 women (98.6%): 90.5% had complete abortion after 400 g misoprostol, 94.2% after 800 g. Noninferiority of 400 g misoprostol was not demonstrated for failure of complete abortion (difference: 3.7%; 95% CI 1.8-5.6%). The 400-g dose showed higher risk of incomplete abortion (P < 0.01) and continuing pregnancy (P < 0.01) than 800 g. Vaginal and sublingual routes had similar risks of failure to achieve complete abortion (P = 0.47, difference in sublingual minus vaginal -0.7%, 95% CI -2.6-1.2%). A similar pattern was observed for continuing pregnancies (P = 0.21). Fewer women reported adverse effects with vaginal than sublingual administration and with the 400-g dose than the 800-g dose. Of the women, 94% were satisfied or highly satisfied with the regimens, 53% preferred the sublingual route and 47% preferred the vaginal route. Conclusions A 400-g dose of misoprostol should not replace the 800-g dose when administered 24 hours after 200 mg mifepristone for inducing abortion in pregnancies up to 63 days. Sublingual and vaginal misoprostol have similar efficacy, but vaginal administration is associated with a lower frequency of adverse effects. © RCOG 2010 BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Vol.117, No.10 (2010), 1186-1196en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02636.xen_US
dc.identifier.issn14710528en_US
dc.identifier.issn14700328en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-77955821321en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/29889
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77955821321&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleMisoprostol dose and route after mifepristone for early medical abortion: A randomised controlled noninferiority trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77955821321&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections