CIDP Treatment Outcomes Correlation With First Nerve Conduction Changes: Ascertainment of Initial and Long-Term Responders

dc.contributor.authorWannarong T.
dc.contributor.authorSkolka M.P.
dc.contributor.authorRattanathamsakul N.
dc.contributor.authorSwart G.
dc.contributor.authorDyck J.B.
dc.contributor.authorBerini S.E.
dc.contributor.authorDubey D.
dc.contributor.authorShouman K.
dc.contributor.authorPinto M.V.
dc.contributor.authorMauermann M.L.
dc.contributor.authorWindebank A.J.
dc.contributor.authorStaff N.P.
dc.contributor.authorKlein C.J.
dc.contributor.correspondenceWannarong T.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-14T18:20:29Z
dc.date.available2025-04-14T18:20:29Z
dc.date.issued2025-06-01
dc.description.abstractBackground and Aims: Nerve conduction studies (NCS) are integral to diagnosing chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), but their role in predicting treatment outcomes remains underexplored. This study evaluates NCS changes at first follow-up (first NCS changes) as predictors of treatment success in CIDP, focusing on their correlation with clinical outcomes over time. Methods: Newly diagnosed CIDP patients meeting the 2021 EAN/PNS criteria were retrospectively evaluated. Baseline and first follow-up NCS parameters were compared with clinical outcomes, assessed by the Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) and Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score. All patients received first-line immunotherapy (intravenous immunoglobulin, corticosteroids, or plasma exchange). Results: Of 39 treated patients, 26 (66.7%) were responders based on improving NIS trends, while 13 (33.3%) were nonresponders. Responders showed significant improvements at the first follow-up in fibular compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude, ulnar CMAP amplitude, summated CMAP amplitudes, and fibular motor conduction velocity. Changes in fibular CMAP amplitude consistently correlated with NIS (R = −0.8 to −0.6, p ≤ 0.004) and INCAT disability score improvements (R = −0.6 to −0.3, p ≤ 0.032) across all follow-up intervals up to 60 months. Ulnar and summated CMAP amplitude changes also correlated with clinical outcomes, though their associations were less sustained than those of fibular CMAP amplitude. Interpretation: The first change in fibular CMAP amplitude is a reliable biomarker for predicting CIDP treatment response, with ulnar and summated CMAP amplitudes as alternatives when the fibular response is absent. Our findings highlight the utility of first NCS changes in monitoring and predicting treatment outcomes in CIDP.
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Peripheral Nervous System Vol.30 No.2 (2025)
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jns.70017
dc.identifier.eissn15298027
dc.identifier.issn10859489
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105002131861
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/109533
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectNeuroscience
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleCIDP Treatment Outcomes Correlation With First Nerve Conduction Changes: Ascertainment of Initial and Long-Term Responders
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105002131861&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue2
oaire.citation.titleJournal of the Peripheral Nervous System
oaire.citation.volume30
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationMayo Clinic

Files

Collections