Research ethics and artificial intelligence for global health: perspectives from the global forum on bioethics in research

dc.contributor.authorShaw J.
dc.contributor.authorAli J.
dc.contributor.authorAtuire C.A.
dc.contributor.authorCheah P.Y.
dc.contributor.authorEspañol A.G.
dc.contributor.authorGichoya J.W.
dc.contributor.authorHunt A.
dc.contributor.authorJjingo D.
dc.contributor.authorLittler K.
dc.contributor.authorPaolotti D.
dc.contributor.authorVayena E.
dc.contributor.correspondenceShaw J.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-25T18:22:00Z
dc.date.available2024-04-25T18:22:00Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: The ethical governance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in health care and public health continues to be an urgent issue for attention in policy, research, and practice. In this paper we report on central themes related to challenges and strategies for promoting ethics in research involving AI in global health, arising from the Global Forum on Bioethics in Research (GFBR), held in Cape Town, South Africa in November 2022. Methods: The GFBR is an annual meeting organized by the World Health Organization and supported by the Wellcome Trust, the US National Institutes of Health, the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) and the South African MRC. The forum aims to bring together ethicists, researchers, policymakers, research ethics committee members and other actors to engage with challenges and opportunities specifically related to research ethics. In 2022 the focus of the GFBR was “Ethics of AI in Global Health Research”. The forum consisted of 6 case study presentations, 16 governance presentations, and a series of small group and large group discussions. A total of 87 participants attended the forum from 31 countries around the world, representing disciplines of bioethics, AI, health policy, health professional practice, research funding, and bioinformatics. In this paper, we highlight central insights arising from GFBR 2022. Results: We describe the significance of four thematic insights arising from the forum: (1) Appropriateness of building AI, (2) Transferability of AI systems, (3) Accountability for AI decision-making and outcomes, and (4) Individual consent. We then describe eight recommendations for governance leaders to enhance the ethical governance of AI in global health research, addressing issues such as AI impact assessments, environmental values, and fair partnerships. Conclusions: The 2022 Global Forum on Bioethics in Research illustrated several innovations in ethical governance of AI for global health research, as well as several areas in need of urgent attention internationally. This summary is intended to inform international and domestic efforts to strengthen research ethics and support the evolution of governance leadership to meet the demands of AI in global health research.
dc.identifier.citationBMC Medical Ethics Vol.25 No.1 (2024)
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12910-024-01044-w
dc.identifier.eissn14726939
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85190707255
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/98108
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectNursing
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectSocial Sciences
dc.titleResearch ethics and artificial intelligence for global health: perspectives from the global forum on bioethics in research
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85190707255&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.titleBMC Medical Ethics
oaire.citation.volume25
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitute for Scientific Interchange Foundation
oairecerif.author.affiliationMakerere University
oairecerif.author.affiliationOrganisation Mondiale de la Santé
oairecerif.author.affiliationETH Zürich
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Toronto Faculty of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Ghana
oairecerif.author.affiliationHarvard University
oairecerif.author.affiliationNuffield Department of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
oairecerif.author.affiliationJohns Hopkins University
oairecerif.author.affiliationEmory University School of Medicine

Files

Collections