The model for strategic drive of Thai higher education institutions toward world-class universities
Issued Date
2022-04-01
Resource Type
eISSN
24523151
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85132675203
Journal Title
Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences
Volume
43
Issue
2
Start Page
271
End Page
278
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences Vol.43 No.2 (2022) , 271-278
Suggested Citation
Chaeddhananan K., Dhirathiti N.S. The model for strategic drive of Thai higher education institutions toward world-class universities. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences Vol.43 No.2 (2022) , 271-278. 278. doi:10.34044/j.kjss.2022.43.2.02 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/87593
Title
The model for strategic drive of Thai higher education institutions toward world-class universities
Author(s)
Author's Affiliation
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
The objective of this research was to propose a model to drive Thai higher education to a world-class level. The purposive sampling technique was applied to obtain 116 key informants from eight universities located in Bangkok and its vicinity for an in-depth interview. Based on five strategies conceptual framework by Fred R. David and the findings from an in-depth interview, the Delphi technique was carried out with a panel of 17 experts to discover an appropriated model to drive Thai universities to be world-class universities. The results revealed that the model consisted of five fundamental guidelines. Firstly, the guideline for the University administrator recruitment, succession strategy and action plans are suggested to include a board with world-class university specialists and the university executive board should have a global vision, high integrity, administrative competencies, world-class-university-oriented goals, and global academic leadership. In addition, their operation plans should satisfy valuable changes. Secondly, the resource allocation guideline is to create high-quality of interdisciplinary research, innovations for global benefits, communication systems, networks, new business models, and resource management. Thirdly, the work system determination guideline recommended creating the student potential development system, innovative research process, social benefits, administrative technological systems, communication and knowledge management, and high-quality human resource. Fourthly, the organizational structure design guideline pursued to indue the efficiency, flexibility, and streamline systems that can collaborate all relating sectors. Lastly, the organizational culture development guideline suggested to promote integrity, international mindset, work with diversity, with a focus on excellence and social benefits.