World Workshop on Oral Medicine VIII: dentists’ compliance with infective endocarditis prophylaxis guidelines for patients with high-risk cardiac conditions: a systematic review

dc.contributor.authorDiz Dios P.
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro L.
dc.contributor.authorPimolbutr K.
dc.contributor.authorGobbo M.
dc.contributor.authorFrance K.
dc.contributor.authorBindakhil M.
dc.contributor.authorHolmes H.
dc.contributor.authorSperotto F.
dc.contributor.authorGraham L.
dc.contributor.authorTurati F.
dc.contributor.authorSalvatori A.
dc.contributor.authorHong C.
dc.contributor.authorSollecito T.P.
dc.contributor.authorLodi G.
dc.contributor.authorThornhill M.H.
dc.contributor.authorLockhart P.B.
dc.contributor.authorEdefonti V.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-23T17:18:04Z
dc.date.available2023-05-23T17:18:04Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: To determine dentists’ awareness and/or adherence to antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) guidelines for preventing infective endocarditis (IE) in patients with high-risk heart conditions. Study Design: A systematic literature review was performed on MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Proquest, Embase, Dentistry, and Oral Sciences Source databases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta–Analyses checklist. Nationwide studies based on questionnaires, surveys, and interviews completed by dentists and published since 2007 were included. Results: From 2907 articles screened, 28 studies were selected (across 20 countries). The quality of included studies was poor due to a lack of standard evaluation tools, low response rates, and lack of questionnaire validity and/or reliability. Approximately 75% of surveyed dentists reported being knowledgeable about AP guidelines, but only ∼25% complied. Reported compliance with American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines was 4 times higher than with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommendations. Some of the highest adherence rates were reported for other national AP guidelines. Significant geographic differences were observed in the estimated adherence to AHA guidelines and the percentage of dentists who reported seeking advice from physicians and/or cardiologists. Conclusion: Rates of compliance and/or adherence were substantially different from rates of knowledge and/or awareness, including relevant geographic dissimilarities. Compliance/adherence was higher for AHA than NICE.
dc.identifier.citationOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology (2023)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.oooo.2022.12.017
dc.identifier.issn22124403
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85153609552
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/82704
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleWorld Workshop on Oral Medicine VIII: dentists’ compliance with infective endocarditis prophylaxis guidelines for patients with high-risk cardiac conditions: a systematic review
dc.typeReview
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85153609552&origin=inward
oaire.citation.titleOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Dentistry
oairecerif.author.affiliationAugusta University
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol University, Faculty of Dentistry
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstituto Universitário de Ciências da Saúde (IUCS)
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of the Western Cape
oairecerif.author.affiliationCarolinas Medical Center
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversità degli Studi di Milano
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversidad de Santiago de Compostela, Facultad de Medicina y Odontología
oairecerif.author.affiliationOspedale Maggiore Policlinico Milano
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity of Pennsylvania
oairecerif.author.affiliationHarvard Medical School
oairecerif.author.affiliationCa' Foncello Hospital

Files

Collections