Efficacy and Safety of Newer Antibiotics Versus Generic Antibiotics for Hospital-Acquired and Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

dc.contributor.authorNguyen A.T.K.
dc.contributor.authorPaterson D.L.
dc.contributor.authorMo Y.
dc.contributor.authorEzure Y.
dc.contributor.authorDuy P.T.
dc.contributor.authorThwaites C.L.
dc.contributor.correspondenceNguyen A.T.K.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-14T18:22:38Z
dc.date.available2026-06-14T18:22:38Z
dc.date.issued2026-05-15
dc.description.abstractBackground: Hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), particularly cases caused by multidrug-resistant organisms, often require newer antibiotic treatment. The efficacy and safety of newer antibiotics compared with generic antibiotics in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have not been evaluated before. Methods: In this systematic review, we searched RCTs in the United States National Library of Medicine (PubMed), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar databases published between 2013 and 2025 (registration no. CRD42023476481). The primary efficacy end point was the 28-day all-cause mortality rate, and the secondary efficacy end points were clinical and microbiological response. The safety end point was nephrotoxicity. Results: We identified 8 eligible RCTs involving 2881 patients with HABP/VABP (1450 treated with newer antibiotics and 1431 treated with generic antibiotics). The meta-analysis did not reveal any significant differences between newer and generic antibiotics in the 28-day all-cause mortality rate (risk ratio [RR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], .72–1.30; I<sup>2</sup> = 30%), the clinical response (1.04 [.93–1.17]; I<sup>2</sup> = 35%), or the microbiological response (1.05 [.89–1.24]; I<sup>2</sup> = 52%). However, newer antibiotics showed significant lower occurrences of nephrotoxicity than regimens with a colistin component (RR, 0.30 [95% CI, .11–.79]; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). In the subgroup analysis, newer antibiotic regimens demonstrated significant improvement in microbiological eradication of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli (RR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.18–1.90]; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Conclusions: Newer antibiotics and generic drugs showed similar efficacy and safety in treating HABP/VABP. The superiority of newer antibiotics in the microbiological eradication of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli could suggest that future trials should be targeted to those patients to improve understanding of the therapeutic use of these antibiotics and the pathophysiology of these conditions.
dc.identifier.citationClinical Infectious Diseases Vol.82 (2026) , S116-S125
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/cid/ciag045
dc.identifier.eissn15376591
dc.identifier.issn10584838
dc.identifier.pmid42227056
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105040842332
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/117305
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleEfficacy and Safety of Newer Antibiotics Versus Generic Antibiotics for Hospital-Acquired and Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105040842332&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPageS125
oaire.citation.startPageS116
oaire.citation.titleClinical Infectious Diseases
oaire.citation.volume82
oairecerif.author.affiliationNational University of Singapore
oairecerif.author.affiliationNUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
oairecerif.author.affiliationNuffield Department of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationNational University Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationUQ Centre for Clinical Research
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit
oairecerif.author.affiliationOxford University Clinical Research Unit

Files

Collections