Microfocused Ultrasound in Regenerative Aesthetics: A Narrative Review on Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Outcomes
Issued Date
2024-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
14732130
eISSN
14732165
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85208183711
Journal Title
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology (2024)
Suggested Citation
Vachiramon V., Pavicic T., Casabona G., Green J., Levine J., Park J.Y., Spada J., Muniz M., Akers J., Jackson M., McCarthy A. Microfocused Ultrasound in Regenerative Aesthetics: A Narrative Review on Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Outcomes. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology (2024). doi:10.1111/jocd.16658 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/101970
Title
Microfocused Ultrasound in Regenerative Aesthetics: A Narrative Review on Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Outcomes
Author's Affiliation
Lenox Hill Hospital
Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
Julieta Spada Dermatology & Aesthetics
Merz Aesthetics
Apkoo-Jung Oracle Dermatology Clinic
Private Office
Ocean Clinic Marbella
Skin Associates of South Florida and Skin Research Institute
Private Practice for Dermatology and Aesthetics
Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
Julieta Spada Dermatology & Aesthetics
Merz Aesthetics
Apkoo-Jung Oracle Dermatology Clinic
Private Office
Ocean Clinic Marbella
Skin Associates of South Florida and Skin Research Institute
Private Practice for Dermatology and Aesthetics
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: Microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) is widely used in aesthetic medicine for skin tightening and rejuvenation. However, its role in regenerative aesthetics and its precise mechanism of action are not fully understood. Objective: This narrative review aims to contextualize and articulate the mechanism of action of MFU-V, evaluate its role in regenerative aesthetics, and assess its effectiveness based on existing clinical, histological, and skin-mechanical studies. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed to collect and analyze studies on MFU's biological mechanisms, clinical outcomes, and impact on extracellular matrix (ECM) regeneration. The review integrates findings from clinical trials, histological analyses, and biomechanical assessments to provide a cohesive understanding of MFU-V's role in aesthetic medicine. Results: MFU-V emits focused ultrasound energy that penetrates multiple skin layers and the superficial musculoaponeurotic system, creating localized thermal coagulation points. These points initiate biological responses that recruit fibroblasts and stimulate the production of new collagen and elastin fibers. Enhanced ECM protein synthesis leads to significant improvements in skin biomechanics and quality, reducing skin laxity and enhancing appearance. Clinical studies support these findings, showing improvements in skin firmness and texture following MFU-V treatment. Conclusion: Through analyzing the underlying biological mechanisms and the observable clinical outcomes, this narrative review sets the stage for a comprehensive understanding of the mechanism of action and role of MFU-V in regenerative aesthetics.