Comparative Effectiveness of Azithromycin versus Erythromycin for Latency Prolongation in Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes < 34 Weeks of Gestation
8
Issued Date
2026-01-01
Resource Type
eISSN
11791411
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105036416585
Journal Title
International Journal of Women S Health
Volume
18
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
International Journal of Women S Health Vol.18 (2026)
Suggested Citation
Chawanpaiboon S., Pooliam J. Comparative Effectiveness of Azithromycin versus Erythromycin for Latency Prolongation in Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes < 34 Weeks of Gestation. International Journal of Women S Health Vol.18 (2026). doi:10.2147/IJWH.S603582 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/116441
Title
Comparative Effectiveness of Azithromycin versus Erythromycin for Latency Prolongation in Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes < 34 Weeks of Gestation
Author(s)
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Objective: Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) is a major contributor to preterm birth and neonatal morbidity. Although azithromycin is increasingly used as an alternative to erythromycin for latency antibiotic therapy, comparative data remain limited. This study evaluated whether azithromycin is associated with latency duration and maternal–neonatal outcomes comparable to those of erythromycin in pregnancies complicated by PPROM before 34 weeks of gestation. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary referral hospital by reviewing medical records from January 2011 through December 2024. Pregnant women with PPROM at 24 to <34 weeks of gestation who completed latency antibiotic regimens were included and categorized into azithromycin or erythromycin groups. The primary outcome was latency period (time from membrane rupture to delivery). Secondary outcomes included maternal infectious complications and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for baseline differences between groups. Results: A total of 720 participants were included (56 azithromycin; 664 erythromycin). Baseline characteristics were generally comparable, although maternal age, monthly income, and previous PPROM differed between groups. Median latency duration did not differ significantly between azithromycin and erythromycin overall (3.70 vs 3.23 days; P = 0.287) or across gestational-age subgroups. After adjustment for baseline differences, the likelihood of achieving latency ≥3 days was similar between groups. Maternal outcomes were largely comparable, although postpartum endometritis occurred more frequently in the azithromycin group with small event numbers. Neonatal outcomes were generally similar; NICU admission was lower, whereas intraventricular hemorrhage was more frequent in the azithromycin group, both based on small numbers. Conclusion: Azithromycin was associated with latency duration and maternal–neonatal outcomes comparable to those of erythromycin and represents a practical alternative regimen for PPROM management. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.