A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of olanzapine versus placebo plus ondansetron and dexamethasone for antiemetic prophylaxis in patients receiving oxaliplatin-, irinotecan-, or carboplatin-based chemotherapy

dc.contributor.authorHarikul W.
dc.contributor.authorNimmannit A.
dc.contributor.authorLaocharoenkeat A.
dc.contributor.authorPhisalprapa P.
dc.contributor.authorKositamongkol C.
dc.contributor.authorThongkijpreecha P.
dc.contributor.authorIthimakin S.
dc.contributor.correspondenceHarikul W.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-02T18:29:23Z
dc.date.available2026-03-02T18:29:23Z
dc.date.issued2026-03-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: A two-drug regimen of palonosetron and dexamethasone is standard for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC), including oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Current guidelines recommend adding an NK1 receptor antagonist for carboplatin-based or MEC in patients with high-risk features. Given the comparable efficacy of olanzapine, this study evaluated the effectiveness of low-dose olanzapine (OLN, 5 mg) combined with ondansetron and dexamethasone in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Methods: In this double-blind, randomized controlled trial, patients initiating oxaliplatin-, carboplatin-, or irinotecan-based chemotherapy were randomized 1:1 to receive OLN or placebo on Days 1–4, with ondansetron and dexamethasone. Randomization was stratified by chemotherapy type and high-risk factors (female aged < 50 years). The primary endpoint was total protection (mild/no nausea, no vomiting, and no rescue therapy) within 120 h post-chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints included total control, complete response, nausea/vomiting severity, rescue use, adverse events, and patient satisfaction. Results: Among 139 evaluable patients, 69 received OLN and 70 received a placebo. Total protection was achieved in 71.0% of OLN patients versus 55.7% with placebo (p = 0.06). Total control was significantly higher with OLN (62.3% vs. 38.6%, p = 0.005). Delayed nausea (grade ≥ 2) occurred less frequently with OLN (13.0% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.015). Complete response and rescue use did not differ between groups. Somnolence rates were similar, but anorexia was less familiar with OLN. Notably, 95.6% of OLN patients preferred to continue the same regimen, compared with 72.9% of placebo recipients (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Olanzapine (5 mg) combined with ondansetron and dexamethasone was associated with a moderate improvement in total protection and significant improvements in no-nausea and total control rates.
dc.identifier.citationSupportive Care in Cancer Vol.34 No.3 (2026)
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00520-026-10490-8
dc.identifier.eissn14337339
dc.identifier.issn09414355
dc.identifier.pmid41731226
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105030905798
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/115494
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectNursing
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of olanzapine versus placebo plus ondansetron and dexamethasone for antiemetic prophylaxis in patients receiving oxaliplatin-, irinotecan-, or carboplatin-based chemotherapy
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105030905798&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue3
oaire.citation.titleSupportive Care in Cancer
oaire.citation.volume34
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital

Files

Collections