Ceftazidime-avibactam and comparators against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected globally and in each geographical region between 2017–2020

dc.contributor.authorKiratisin P.
dc.contributor.authorKempf M.
dc.contributor.authorStone G.
dc.contributor.authorUtt E.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-09T18:01:47Z
dc.date.available2023-08-09T18:01:47Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-01
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The objective of this study was to assess the distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates against ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and a panel of comparator agents collected globally and in each region from 2017–2020 from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance program. Methods: Susceptibility and minimum inhibitory concentration of all P. aeruginosa isolates were determined using broth microdilution methodology according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Results: Of the total 29746 isolates of P. aeruginosa collected, 20.9% were multidrug resistant (MDR), 20.7% were extremely drug resistant (XDR), 8.4% were CAZ-AVI-resistant (CAZ-AVI-R), and 3.0% were MBL-positive. Amongst the MBL-positive isolates, the proportion of VIM-positive isolates was highest (77.8%). The highest proportion of MDR (25.5%), XDR (25.0%), MBL-positive (5.7%), and CAZ-AVI-R (12.3%) isolates were in Latin America. Amongst the sources, the highest proportion of isolates were from respiratory sources (43.0%), and the majority of isolates were from non-intensive care unit wards (71.2%). Overall, all P. aeruginosa isolates (90.9%) showed high susceptibility to CAZ-AVI. However, MDR and XDR isolates were less susceptible to CAZ-AVI (≤60.7). The only comparators to which all isolates of P. aeruginosa showed good overall susceptibility were colistin (99.1%) and amikacin (90.5%). However, only colistin was active (≥98.3%) against all the resistant isolates. Conclusion: CAZ-AVI presents a potential treatment option against P. aeruginosa infections. However, active monitoring and surveillance, especially of the resistant phenotypes, is warranted for effective treatment of infections caused by P. aeruginosa.
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance Vol.34 (2023) , 113-118
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jgar.2023.06.005
dc.identifier.eissn22137173
dc.identifier.issn22137165
dc.identifier.pmid37422001
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85165939880
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/88227
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiology
dc.titleCeftazidime-avibactam and comparators against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected globally and in each geographical region between 2017–2020
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85165939880&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage118
oaire.citation.startPage113
oaire.citation.titleJournal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
oaire.citation.volume34
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversité d’Angers
oairecerif.author.affiliationCHU Angers
oairecerif.author.affiliationPfizer Inc.

Files

Collections