Continuous Infusion of Fluid Hydration Over 24 Hours Does Not Prevent Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis

dc.contributor.authorChang A.
dc.contributor.authorPausawasdi N.
dc.contributor.authorCharatcharoenwitthaya P.
dc.contributor.authorKaosombatwattana U.
dc.contributor.authorSriprayoon T.
dc.contributor.authorLimsrivilai J.
dc.contributor.authorPrachayakul V.
dc.contributor.authorLeelakusolvong S.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-18T16:46:24Z
dc.date.available2023-06-18T16:46:24Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: Aggressive intravenous fluid hydration, by administering 3500 mL of lactated Ringer’s solution (LRS) in 9 h with a peri-procedural bolus, reduces post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) incidence. A concern of this strategy is adverse events related to volume overload; however, the impact of fluid hydration over an extended period without a bolus on PEP is unknown. Aim: To assess the effect of continuous infusion of high-volume fluid at a constant rate over 24 h on PEP incidence and severity. Methods: Two-hundred patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 3600 mL of LRS in 24 h starting 2 h before the ERCP (high-volume group) or maintenance fluid hydration calculated by the Holliday-Segar method (control group). Results: The mean age of the patients was 50.6 ± 11.6 years. The predominant indications were choledocholithiasis (48%) and malignancies (32%). Patient demographics and PEP risk factors were similar in both groups. Patients in the high-volume group received significantly more fluid than the control group (3600 vs. 2413 ml, P < 0.001). PEP incidence was not different between the high-volume and the control group (14% vs. 15%; relative risk 0.93: 95% CI 0.48–1.83, P = 0.84). There were no differences in moderate to severe PEP (3% vs. 4%; relative risk 0.75: 95% CI, 0.17–3.27, P = 1.00). Subgroup analysis did not show a benefit in high-risk patients. Only one patient in the control group developed peripheral edema. Conclusions: An infusion of high-volume hydration over 24 h is not sufficient to provide optimal hydration for PEP prevention. Clinical Trial Registry Number: No. NCT 02821546.
dc.identifier.citationDigestive Diseases and Sciences Vol.67 No.8 (2022) , 4122-4130
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10620-021-07256-z
dc.identifier.eissn15732568
dc.identifier.issn01632116
dc.identifier.pmid34655014
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85117126659
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/83667
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
dc.titleContinuous Infusion of Fluid Hydration Over 24 Hours Does Not Prevent Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85117126659&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage4130
oaire.citation.issue8
oaire.citation.startPage4122
oaire.citation.titleDigestive Diseases and Sciences
oaire.citation.volume67
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationHatyai Hospital

Files

Collections