Prognostic Accuracy of Screening Tools for Clinical Deterioration in Adults With Suspected Sepsis in Northeastern Thailand: A Cohort Validation Study
Issued Date
2024-05-01
Resource Type
eISSN
23288957
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85194361202
Journal Title
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Volume
11
Issue
5
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Vol.11 No.5 (2024)
Suggested Citation
Wixon-Genack J., Wright S.W., Cobb Ortega N.L., Hantrakun V., Rudd K.E., Teparrukkul P., Limmathurotsakul D., West T.E. Prognostic Accuracy of Screening Tools for Clinical Deterioration in Adults With Suspected Sepsis in Northeastern Thailand: A Cohort Validation Study. Open Forum Infectious Diseases Vol.11 No.5 (2024). doi:10.1093/ofid/ofae245 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/98634
Title
Prognostic Accuracy of Screening Tools for Clinical Deterioration in Adults With Suspected Sepsis in Northeastern Thailand: A Cohort Validation Study
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: We sought to assess the performance of commonly used clinical scoring systems to predict imminent clinical deterioration in patients hospitalized with suspected infection in rural Thailand. Methods: Patients with suspected infection were prospectively enrolled within 24hours of admission to a referral hospital in northeastern Thailand between 2013 and 2017. In patients not requiring intensive medical interventions, multiple enrollment scores were calculated including the National Early Warning Score (NEWS), the Modified Early Warning Score, Between the Flags, and the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. Scores were tested for predictive accuracy of clinical deterioration, defined as a new requirement of mechanical ventilation, vasoactive medications, intensive care unit admission, and/or death approximately 1 day after enrollment. The association of each score with clinical deterioration was evaluated by means of logistic regression, and discrimination was assessed by generating area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: Of 4989 enrolled patients, 2680 met criteria for secondary analysis, and 100 of 2680 (4%) experienced clinical deterioration within 1 day after enrollment. NEWS had the highest discrimination for predicting clinical deterioration (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.78 [95% confidence interval,. 74-.83]) compared with the Modified Early Warning Score (0.67 [.63-.73]; P <. 001), quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (0.65 [.60-.70]; P <. 001), and Between the Flags (0.69 [.64-.75]; P <. 001). NEWS ≥5 yielded optimal sensitivity and specificity for clinical deterioration prediction. Conclusions: In patients hospitalized with suspected infection in a resource-limited setting in Southeast Asia, NEWS can identify patients at risk of imminent clinical deterioration with greater accuracy than other clinical scoring systems.