Pulmonary complications following urological, gastrointestinal and gynaecological abdominal Surgery––A post-hoc analysis of an observational study in 29 countries

dc.contributor.authorVermeulen T.D.
dc.contributor.authorHemmes S.N.T.
dc.contributor.authorBlok S.
dc.contributor.authorSchultz M.J.
dc.contributor.authorHiesmayr M.
dc.contributor.authorMills G.H.
dc.contributor.authorPutensen C.
dc.contributor.authorSchmid W.
dc.contributor.authorSerpa Neto A.
dc.contributor.authorSevergnini P.
dc.contributor.authorVidal Melo M.F.
dc.contributor.authorWrigge H.
dc.contributor.authorHollmann M.W.
dc.contributor.authorGama de Abreu M.
dc.contributor.authorvan Meenen D.M.P.
dc.contributor.authorHemmes S.N.T.
dc.contributor.authorNeto A.S.
dc.contributor.authorBinnekade J.M.
dc.contributor.authorCanet J.
dc.contributor.authorHedenstierna G.
dc.contributor.authorJaber S.
dc.contributor.authorHiesmayr M.
dc.contributor.authorHollmann M.W.
dc.contributor.authorMills G.H.
dc.contributor.authorVidal Melo M.F.
dc.contributor.authorPearse R.
dc.contributor.authorPutensen C.
dc.contributor.authorSchmid W.
dc.contributor.authorSevergnini P.
dc.contributor.authorWrigge H.
dc.contributor.authorde Abreu M.G.
dc.contributor.authorPelosi P.
dc.contributor.authorSchultz M.J.
dc.contributor.authorKroell W.
dc.contributor.authorMetzler H.
dc.contributor.authorStruber G.
dc.contributor.authorWegscheider T.
dc.contributor.authorGombotz H.
dc.contributor.authorHiesmayr M.
dc.contributor.authorSchmid W.
dc.contributor.authorUrbanek B.
dc.contributor.authorKahn D.
dc.contributor.authorMomeni M.
dc.contributor.authorPospiech A.
dc.contributor.authorLois F.
dc.contributor.authorForget P.
dc.contributor.authorGrosu I.
dc.contributor.authorPoelaert J.
dc.contributor.authorvan Mossevelde V.
dc.contributor.authorvan Malderen M.C.
dc.contributor.authorDylst D.
dc.contributor.authorvan Melkebeek J.
dc.contributor.authorBeran M.
dc.contributor.authorde Hert S.
dc.contributor.authorDe Baerdemaeker L.
dc.contributor.authorHeyse B.
dc.contributor.authorVan Limmen J.
dc.contributor.authorWyffels P.
dc.contributor.authorJacobs T.
dc.contributor.authorRoels N.
dc.contributor.authorDe Bruyne A.
dc.contributor.authorvan de Velde S.
dc.contributor.authorJuros-Zovko M.
dc.contributor.authorDjonoviċ- Omanoviċ D.
dc.contributor.authorPernar S.
dc.contributor.authorZunic J.
dc.contributor.authorMiskovic P.
dc.contributor.authorZilic A.
dc.contributor.authorKvolik S.
dc.contributor.authorIvic D.
dc.contributor.authorAzenic-Venzera D.
dc.contributor.authorSkiljic S.
dc.contributor.authorVinkovic H.
dc.contributor.authorOputric I.
dc.contributor.authorJuricic K.
dc.contributor.authorFrkovic V.
dc.contributor.authorKopic J.
dc.contributor.authorMirkovic I.
dc.contributor.authorKaranovic N.
dc.contributor.authorCarev M.
dc.contributor.authorDropulic N.
dc.contributor.authorPavicic Saric J.
dc.contributor.authorErceg G.
dc.contributor.authorBogdanovic Dvorscak M.
dc.contributor.authorMazul-Sunko B.
dc.contributor.authorMarija Pavicic A.
dc.contributor.authorGoranovic T.
dc.contributor.authorMaldini B.
dc.contributor.authorRadocaj T.
dc.contributor.authorGavranovic Z.
dc.contributor.authorMladic-Batinica I.
dc.contributor.authorSehovic M.
dc.contributor.authorStourac P.
dc.contributor.authorHarazim H.
dc.contributor.authorSmekalova O.
dc.contributor.authorKosinova M.
dc.contributor.authorKolacek T.
dc.contributor.authorHudacek K.
dc.contributor.authorDrab M.
dc.contributor.authorBrujevic J.
dc.contributor.correspondenceVermeulen T.D.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-10T18:40:38Z
dc.date.available2026-04-10T18:40:38Z
dc.date.issued2026-01-01
dc.description.abstractBackgroundThe incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs33Postoperative Pulmonary Complications.) following abdominal surgery varies across surgical specialties. It remains unclear to what extent the incidence of PPCs is attributable to known patient–related factors and anaesthesia duration, rather than to differences inherent to the surgical specialty itself.MethodsPost-hoc analysis of an observational study describing postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing urological, gastrointestinal, and gynaecological abdominal surgery. The primary endpoint was a composite measure of PPCs. Secondary endpoints included the individual incidence of each PPC. Propensity score weighting was used to create a cohort with similar patient characteristics and anaesthesia duration.ResultsThe cohort consisted of 3306 patients across 146 centres in 29 countries–367 underwent urological surgery, 2100 underwent gastrointestinal surgery, and 839 underwent gynaecological surgery. Risk scores for PPCs were highest in urological surgical patients, followed by gastrointestinal and gynaecological surgical patients. PPCs also occurred most often after urological surgery (17.7%), followed by gastrointestinal (14.9%) and gynaecological surgery (9.8%) (p < 0.001). After weighting, these differences in incidence disappeared, with comparable rates across the three groups (urological surgery 15.7%, gastrointestinal 14.5%, gynaecological 12.2%; p = 0.340). Apart from unplanned supplementary oxygen, all PPCs were most frequent after gastrointestinal surgery and least common following gynaecological surgery.ConclusionsIn this worldwide cohort of patients undergoing abdominal surgery, the incidence of PPCs varied across urological, gastrointestinal, and gynaecological surgery; the differences in incidence may be more strongly influenced by patient–related factors and anaesthesia duration than by the characteristics of the surgical specialty itself. Gastrointestinal surgeries showed the highest rates of severe PPCs.
dc.identifier.citationAnaesthesia Critical Care and Pain Medicine (2026)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101738
dc.identifier.eissn23525568
dc.identifier.pmid41380776
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105034503782
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/116108
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titlePulmonary complications following urological, gastrointestinal and gynaecological abdominal Surgery––A post-hoc analysis of an observational study in 29 countries
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105034503782&origin=inward
oaire.citation.titleAnaesthesia Critical Care and Pain Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationColumbia University
oairecerif.author.affiliationMassachusetts General Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationMonash University
oairecerif.author.affiliationCleveland Clinic Foundation
oairecerif.author.affiliationAmsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
oairecerif.author.affiliationMedizinische Universität Wien
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinikum Bonn
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversità degli Studi dell'Insubria
oairecerif.author.affiliationNuffield Department of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden
oairecerif.author.affiliationRoyal Hallamshire Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationHospital Israelita Albert Einstein
oairecerif.author.affiliationAustin Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationAntoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit
oairecerif.author.affiliationBG-Kliniken Bergmannstrost Halle
oairecerif.author.affiliationMartin−Luther−University of Halle−Wittenberg

Files

Collections