Spinal Extramedullary Arteriovenous Fistulas: A 15-Year Endovascular Treatment Experience in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Thailand
Issued Date
2023-09-26
Resource Type
eISSN
22114599
DOI
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85173523436
Journal Title
International Journal of Spine Surgery
Volume
17
Issue
4
Start Page
570
End Page
578
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
International Journal of Spine Surgery Vol.17 No.4 (2023) , 570-578
Suggested Citation
Boonyakarnkul S., Somboonnithiphol K., Theerapancharoen W., Chanthanaphak E., Lueangapapong P., Ayudhaya S.S.N. Spinal Extramedullary Arteriovenous Fistulas: A 15-Year Endovascular Treatment Experience in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Thailand. International Journal of Spine Surgery Vol.17 No.4 (2023) , 570-578. 578. doi:10.14444/8446 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/90572
Title
Spinal Extramedullary Arteriovenous Fistulas: A 15-Year Endovascular Treatment Experience in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Thailand
Author's Affiliation
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: Spinal arteriovenous shunts are rare diseases. Different classifications have been proposed, but the most widely used are those classified by locations. Different locations (i.e., intramedullary and extramedullary) have different treatment outcomes and different posttreatment angiographical results. Our study presents the 15-year endovascular treatment outcomes of patients who had spinal extramedullary arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) at Ramathibodi Hospital, which is a tertiary care hospital in Thailand. Methods: A retrospective medical record and imaging review of all patients with spinal extramedullary AVFs, which were confirmed by a diagnostic spinal angiogram in our institute from January 2006 to December 2020, were performed. The angiographic complete obliteration rate in the first session of endovascular treatment, clinical outcomes of the patients, and complications of the procedures for all eligible patients were analyzed. Results: Sixty-eight eligible patients were included in the study. The most common diagnosis was spinal dural AVF (45.6%). The most common presenting symptoms were weakness, numbness, and bowel-bladder involvement (70.6%, 67.6%, and 57.4%, respectively). Ninety-four percent had spinal cord edema in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. All patients had pial venous reflux. Sixty-four patients (94.1%) received endovascular treatment as the first option. The complete obliteration rate in the first session of endovascular treatment was 75% and was high in all subgroups except for the perimedullary AVF group. The overall intraoperative complication of endovascular treatment was 9.4%. Follow-up imaging showed no residual AVF in 50 patients (87.7%). Most of the patients (57.4%) had improvement of neurological functions at 3- to 6-month follow-up. Conclusion: Treatment results of spinal extramedullary AVFs were good in terms of angiographic aspects and clinical outcomes. This may have resulted from the locations of the AVFs, which mostly did not involve the spinal cord arterial supply, with the exception of perimedullary AVFs. Although perimedullary AVF is difficult to treat, it can be cured by careful catherization and embolization. Minimally Invasive Surgery.