Integrating Clinical and Histopathological Data to Predict Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients Using Machine Learning Techniques

dc.contributor.authorTirasattayapitak S.
dc.contributor.authorRatanatharathorn C.
dc.contributor.authorThotsiri S.
dc.contributor.authorSutharattanapong N.
dc.contributor.authorWiwattanathum P.
dc.contributor.authorArpornsujaritkun N.
dc.contributor.authorSirisopana K.
dc.contributor.authorWorawichawong S.
dc.contributor.authorRostaing L.
dc.contributor.authorKantachuvesiri S.
dc.contributor.correspondenceTirasattayapitak S.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-03T18:34:37Z
dc.date.available2025-01-03T18:34:37Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: Given the significant impact of delayed graft function (DGF) on transplant outcomes, the aim of this study was to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models capable of predicting the risk of DGF in deceased-donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using clinical and histopathological data collected between 2018 and 2022 at Ramathibodi Hospital from DDKT donors, recipients, and post-implantation time-zero kidney biopsy samples to develop predictive models. The performance of three ML models (neural network, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost]) and traditional logistic regression on an independent test data set was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and Brier score calibration. Results: Among 354 DDKT recipients, 64 (18.1%) experienced DGF. The key contributing factors included a donor body mass index > 23 kg/m2, donor diabetes mellitus, a prolonged cold ischemia time, a male recipient, and an interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy score of 2–3 in the time-zero kidney biopsy sample. The random forest model had a specificity of 99.96% and an AUROC of 0.9323, the neural network model had a specificity of 97.43% and an AUROC of 0.844, and the XGBoost model had a specificity of 99.81% and an AUROC of 0.989. A traditional statistical model had a specificity of 84.4% and an AUROC of 0.769. Conclusions: Predictive models, especially XGBoost models, have potential as tools for assessing DGF risk post-DDKT, guiding acceptance decisions, and avoiding risky biopsy, and they may be crucial in resource-limited settings.
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Medicine Vol.13 No.24 (2024)
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm13247502
dc.identifier.eissn20770383
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85213290030
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/102597
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleIntegrating Clinical and Histopathological Data to Predict Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients Using Machine Learning Techniques
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85213290030&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue24
oaire.citation.titleJournal of Clinical Medicine
oaire.citation.volume13
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble

Files

Collections