Cost-Utility Analysis of Metabolic Bariatric Surgery for Individuals with Obesity in Saudi Arabia

dc.contributor.authorNagi M.A.
dc.contributor.authorTurongkaravee S.
dc.contributor.authorAlmalki Z.S.
dc.contributor.authorThavorncharoensap M.
dc.contributor.authorSangroongruangsri S.
dc.contributor.authorChaikledkaew U.
dc.contributor.authorAlqahtani A.M.
dc.contributor.authorAlsharif L.S.
dc.contributor.authorAlsubaihi I.A.
dc.contributor.authorAlzarea A.I.
dc.contributor.authorAlsultan M.M.
dc.contributor.correspondenceNagi M.A.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-15T18:22:37Z
dc.date.available2025-08-15T18:22:37Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) is an effective and relatively safe intervention for managing obesity. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-utility of MBS compared with the standard treatment—lifestyle modification plus liraglutide—in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Methods: A Markov model was developed to estimate the lifetime costs and outcomes of MBS. Costs and outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 3%. The analysis was conducted from societal and healthcare system perspectives, using a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of one to three times the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained. Direct medical and nonmedical costs were obtained from hospital records and patient surveys, respectively. Transitional probabilities and utility values were obtained from published literature and primary data collection in the KSA. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess parameter uncertainty. Results: Over a lifetime horizon, MBS yielded 0.38 incremental QALY and US$ 11,975 (Saudi Riyal [SAR] 44,905; purchasing power parity [PPP] 23,911) incremental costs, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$ 31,909 (SAR 119,660; PPP 63,717) per QALY gained from a societal perspective and US$ 36,353 (SAR 136,324); PPP 72,590) from a healthcare system perspective. The model was most sensitive to the discount rates of costs and outcomes and the direct medical costs associated with MBS. At a WTP threshold of one GDP per capita (US$ 30,436; SAR 114,135; PPP 60,775), the standard treatment had a 63% probability of being cost-effective. However, at a threshold of approximately 1.8 GDP per capita (US$ 56,000; SAR 210,000; PPP 111,821), MBS was cost-effective in 100% of the iterations. Conclusion: MBS is a cost-effective intervention compared with standard treatment in the context of the KSA. Efforts should be made to expand earlier and equitable access to MBS for individuals with a BMI > 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup> without comorbidities across the country.
dc.identifier.citationClinicoeconomics and Outcomes Research Vol.17 (2025) , 519-533
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/CEOR.S527169
dc.identifier.eissn11786981
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105012279911
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/111649
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
dc.titleCost-Utility Analysis of Metabolic Bariatric Surgery for Individuals with Obesity in Saudi Arabia
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105012279911&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage533
oaire.citation.startPage519
oaire.citation.titleClinicoeconomics and Outcomes Research
oaire.citation.volume17
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol University
oairecerif.author.affiliationPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University
oairecerif.author.affiliationImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
oairecerif.author.affiliationJouf University
oairecerif.author.affiliationKing Fahad Medical City
oairecerif.author.affiliationAljanad University for Science and Technology
oairecerif.author.affiliationSaudi National Institute of Health

Files

Collections