Anatomy of mamillo-accessory foramen and prevalence of ossified mamillo-accessory ligament in lumbar vertebrae related to age
Issued Date
2024-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
09301038
eISSN
12798517
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85196388058
Journal Title
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy (2024)
Suggested Citation
Poodendaen C., Suwannakhan A., Chaiyamoon A., Innoi S., Iamsaard S., Yurasakpong L., Khanthiyong B., Iwanaga J., Tubbs R.S. Anatomy of mamillo-accessory foramen and prevalence of ossified mamillo-accessory ligament in lumbar vertebrae related to age. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy (2024). doi:10.1007/s00276-024-03412-y Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/99014
Title
Anatomy of mamillo-accessory foramen and prevalence of ossified mamillo-accessory ligament in lumbar vertebrae related to age
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Purpose: Ossification of the mamillo-accessory ligament (MAL) results in the formation of a mamillo-accessory foramen (MAF), which is associated with aging. The MAL tethers the medial branches of the lumbar dorsal rami to the lumbar vertebrae. A MAL ossified at the lumbar vertebrae can cause low back pain by compressing the medial branch of a dorsal ramus. Age ranges related to ossification of the MAL have not been reported in previous studies. The objective of the present study was to determine the prevalence of ossification of the MAL in the lumbar column and its relationship to aging, and to measure the newly formed MAF at each level of the lumbar vertebrae. Methods: This study examined 935 dried lumbar vertebrae from 187 donors at Khon Kaen University, Thailand, consisting of 93 females and 94 males. The research focused on ossification patterns of the MAL, categorizing them into three patterns. Results: We found that over 50% of ossified MAL occurred in the 30–45-year-old range and the frequency increased with age. The prevalence of ossified lumbar MAL was 72.73%, especially in L5 on the left side in females (76.92%). The width of the MAF did not differ significantly between the sexes, but it was greater on the left side (2.46 ± 1.08; n = 76) than the right (2.05 ± 0.95; n = 72) (p = 0.016). Conclusion: Ossification of the MAL into the MAF progresses with age, leading to low back pain from nerve compression. Physicians should be aware of the MAF during anesthesia block to treat low back pain.