Comprehensive clinicopathological evaluation of malignant localized gingival enlargements in the Thai population

dc.contributor.authorRungraungrayabkul D.
dc.contributor.authorSripodok P.
dc.contributor.authorArayapisit T.
dc.contributor.authorSrimaneekarn N.
dc.contributor.authorKitkumthorn N.
dc.contributor.authorNeeranadpuree V.
dc.contributor.authorAmornwatcharapong W.
dc.contributor.authorHempornwisarn S.
dc.contributor.authorAmornwikaikul S.
dc.contributor.authorLapthanasupkul P.
dc.contributor.correspondenceRungraungrayabkul D.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-11T18:20:48Z
dc.date.available2026-05-11T18:20:48Z
dc.date.issued2026-06-01
dc.description.abstractMalignant localized gingival enlargements (LGEs) are rare and often clinically mimic reactive or benign lesions, creating diagnostic challenges. The present study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and origins of malignant LGEs, assess clinicopathological diagnostic concordance, and identify the distinction of clinical features in a Thai population. A total of 96 malignant LGEs diagnosed over a 40‑year period were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, and clinical and pathological diagnoses were collected. Malignant LGEs were categorized by origin, and diagnostic concordance was evaluated. Clinical features were compared between epithelial and non‑epithelial malignant LGEs, and a decision tree model was constructed to iden‑ tify predictive factors. Epithelial (60.4%) and non‑epithelial (39.6%) malignant LGEs indicated a comparable distribu‑ tion. Non‑epithelial lesions demonstrated substantially lower diagnostic concordance and were frequently misdiagnosed as reactive or benign conditions. Significant differences between groups were observed in age (P=0.004), surface texture (P=0.003), color (P=0.014), and location (P=0.044). Decision tree analysis identified age (P=0.018) and surface texture (P=0.03) as key predictors of non‑epithelial malig‑ nant LGEs. Non‑epithelial malignant LGEs are particularly prone to clinical misdiagnosis. Lesions occurring in younger patients, notably those with smooth surface texture, should raise suspicion for non‑epithelial malignancy and prompt timely biopsy and referral. These findings may aid clinicians in improving early recognition of malignant LGEs.
dc.identifier.citationBiomedical Reports Vol.24 No.6 (2026)
dc.identifier.doi10.3892/br.2026.2144
dc.identifier.eissn20499442
dc.identifier.issn20499434
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105037759753
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/116681
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
dc.subjectNeuroscience
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleComprehensive clinicopathological evaluation of malignant localized gingival enlargements in the Thai population
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105037759753&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue6
oaire.citation.titleBiomedical Reports
oaire.citation.volume24
oairecerif.author.affiliationMahidol University, Faculty of Dentistry

Files

Collections