Lazertinib Versus Osimertinib in Previously Untreated EGFR-Mutant Advanced NSCLC: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Exploratory Analysis From MARIPOSA

dc.contributor.authorLee S.H.
dc.contributor.authorLu S.
dc.contributor.authorHayashi H.
dc.contributor.authorFelip E.
dc.contributor.authorSpira A.I.
dc.contributor.authorGirard N.
dc.contributor.authorKim Y.J.
dc.contributor.authorOstapenko Y.
dc.contributor.authorDanchaivijitr P.
dc.contributor.authorLiu B.
dc.contributor.authorAlip A.
dc.contributor.authorKorbenfeld E.
dc.contributor.authorDias J.M.
dc.contributor.authorLee K.H.
dc.contributor.authorXiong H.
dc.contributor.authorHow S.H.
dc.contributor.authorCheng Y.
dc.contributor.authorChang G.C.
dc.contributor.authorChih-Hsin Yang J.
dc.contributor.authorBesse B.
dc.contributor.authorThomas M.
dc.contributor.authorShah S.
dc.contributor.authorBaig M.
dc.contributor.authorCurtin J.C.
dc.contributor.authorZhang J.
dc.contributor.authorXie J.
dc.contributor.authorSun T.
dc.contributor.authorSethi S.
dc.contributor.authorWang M.
dc.contributor.authorFennema E.
dc.contributor.authorDaksh M.
dc.contributor.authorEnnis M.
dc.contributor.authorBauml J.M.
dc.contributor.authorCho B.C.
dc.contributor.correspondenceLee S.H.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-16T18:13:13Z
dc.date.available2025-08-16T18:13:13Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-01
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Lazertinib is a central nervous system–penetrant, third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that was selected for combination with amivantamab due to its relatively low rates of wild-type EGFR toxicities. In the phase 3 MARIPOSA study, amivantamab plus lazertinib (amivantamab-lazertinib) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS; p < 0.001) versus osimertinib in participants with treatment-naive EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC. A lazertinib monotherapy arm was included to assess the contribution of components in the combination. This is the first randomized, double-blind comparison of two third-generation EGFR TKIs, lazertinib and osimertinib. Methods: In MARIPOSA, 1074 participants were randomized 2:2:1 to receive amivantamab-lazertinib (n = 429), osimertinib monotherapy (n = 429), or lazertinib monotherapy (n = 216). This exploratory analysis compared the efficacy and safety of lazertinib and osimertinib. Results: At a median follow-up of 22.0 months, median PFS was 18.5 months for lazertinib versus 16.6 months for osimertinib (hazard ratio = 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.79–1.22; p = 0.86). PFS results were comparable between arms among predefined subgroups. Among participants with measurable disease at baseline, objective response rate was 83% for lazertinib versus 85% for osimertinib, with a median duration of response among confirmed responders of 16.6 months versus 16.8 months, respectively. Median overall survival was not reached for both arms (hazard ratio = 1.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.73–1.38) at the interim analysis. Adverse events for both arms were mostly grades 1 to 2 and frequently related to EGFR inhibition. Lazertinib was associated with lower rates of QT interval prolongation versus osimertinib. Conclusions: Lazertinib demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to osimertinib, including in predefined subgroups.
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Thoracic Oncology (2025)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jtho.2025.06.030
dc.identifier.eissn15561380
dc.identifier.issn15560864
dc.identifier.pmid40617394
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105012856780
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/111683
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleLazertinib Versus Osimertinib in Previously Untreated EGFR-Mutant Advanced NSCLC: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Exploratory Analysis From MARIPOSA
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105012856780&origin=inward
oaire.citation.titleJournal of Thoracic Oncology
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversiti Malaya
oairecerif.author.affiliationGerman Cancer Research Center
oairecerif.author.affiliationNational Taiwan University Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationSamsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan university
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut de Cancerologie Gustave Roussy
oairecerif.author.affiliationHarbin Medical University
oairecerif.author.affiliationInternational Islamic University Malaysia
oairecerif.author.affiliationSeoul National University Bundang Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationKindai University School of Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationChung Shan Medical University Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationJohnson & Johnson
oairecerif.author.affiliationShanghai Chest Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationJohnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, Raritan
oairecerif.author.affiliationChungbuk National University Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationYonsei Cancer Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationHospital de Câncer de Barretos
oairecerif.author.affiliationHospital Britanico de Buenos Aires
oairecerif.author.affiliationNational Cancer Institute of Ukraine
oairecerif.author.affiliationJilin Cancer Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationVirginia Cancer Specialists
oairecerif.author.affiliationHuizhou Municipal Central Hospital of Guangdong Province

Files

Collections