Prevalence and related factors of inappropriate gestational weight gain among pregnant women with overweight/ obesity in Thailand
Issued Date
2023-12-01
Resource Type
eISSN
14712393
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85158848905
Pubmed ID
37147586
Journal Title
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Volume
23
Issue
1
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Vol.23 No.1 (2023)
Suggested Citation
Chairat T., Ratinthorn A., Limruangrong P., Boriboonhirunsarn D. Prevalence and related factors of inappropriate gestational weight gain among pregnant women with overweight/ obesity in Thailand. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Vol.23 No.1 (2023). doi:10.1186/s12884-023-05635-0 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/82653
Title
Prevalence and related factors of inappropriate gestational weight gain among pregnant women with overweight/ obesity in Thailand
Author's Affiliation
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: An inappropriate gestational weight gain (GWG) among pregnant women with overweight/obesity is a crucial health problem. Its prevalence remains high worldwide, particularly in urban areas. The prevalence and predicting factors in Thailand are lack of evidence. This study aimed to investigate prevalence rates, antenatal care (ANC) service arrangement, predictive factors, and impacts of inappropriate GWG among pregnant women with overweight/obesity in Bangkok and its surrounding metropolitan area. Methods: This cross-sectional, retrospective study used four sets of questionnaires investigating 685 pregnant women with overweight/obesity and 51 nurse-midwives (NMs) from July to December 2019 in ten tertiary hospitals. Multinomial logistic regression identified predictive factors with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Result: The prevalence rates of excessive and inadequate GWG were 62.34% and 12.99%. Weight management for pregnant women with overweight/obesity are unavailable in tertiary cares. Over three-fourths of NMs have never received weight management training for this particular group. ANC service factors, i.e., GWG counseling by ANC providers, quality of general ANC service at an excellent and good level, NMs' positive attitudes toward GWG control, significantly decreased the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of inadequate GWG by 0.03, 0.01, 0.02, 0.20, times, respectively. While maternal factors, sufficient income, and easy access to low-fat foods reduce AOR of inadequate GWG by 0.49, and 0.31 times. In contrast, adequate maternal GWG knowledge statistically increased the AOR of inadequate GWG 1.81 times. Meanwhile, easy access to low-fat foods and internal weight locus of control (WLOC) decreased the AOR of excessive GWG by 0.29 and 0.57 times. Finally, excessive GWG significantly increased the risk of primary C/S, fetal LGA, and macrosomia 1.65, 1.60, and 5.84 times, respectively, while inadequate GWG was not associated with adverse outcomes. Conclusion: Prevalence rates of inappropriate GWG, especially excessive GWG remained high and affected adverse outcomes. The quality of ANC service provision and appropriate GWG counseling from ANC providers are significant health service factors. Thus, NMs should receive gestational weight counseling and management training to improve women's knowledge and practice for gestational weight (GW) control.