Perceptions of orthodontic residents toward the implementation of dental technologies in postgraduate curriculum
Issued Date
2023-09-01
Resource Type
eISSN
14726831
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85169529797
Pubmed ID
37658317
Journal Title
BMC oral health
Volume
23
Issue
1
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
BMC oral health Vol.23 No.1 (2023) , 625
Suggested Citation
Nakornnoi T., Chantakao C., Luangaram N., Janbamrung T., Thitasomakul T., Sipiyaruk K. Perceptions of orthodontic residents toward the implementation of dental technologies in postgraduate curriculum. BMC oral health Vol.23 No.1 (2023) , 625. doi:10.1186/s12903-023-03327-x Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/89599
Title
Perceptions of orthodontic residents toward the implementation of dental technologies in postgraduate curriculum
Author's Affiliation
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dental technologies have increasingly been implemented in orthodontic practice to offer better experiences for orthodontists and patients, however, there is no scientific evidence yet whether which technologies should be implemented into the postgraduate programs. OBJECTIVES: To investigate perceptions of orthodontic residents toward the confidence and importance of dental technologies, as well as to determine their necessity in postgraduate programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The online questionnaire was designed to collect data from residents from all accredited orthodontic postgraduate programs in Thailand. The questionnaire consisted of four sections, which were (1) demographic data, (2) self-perceived importance of orthodontic technologies, (3) self-perceived confidence toward orthodontic technologies, and (4) the necessity of orthodontic technologies in postgraduate programs. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Spearman correlation, and a chi-square test. RESULTS: Intraoral scanner was found to be an orthodontic technology with the highest scores for both self-perceived importance (4.37 ± 0.59) and confidence (4.23 ± 0.75), followed by cone-beam computed tomography, digital treatment planning software, and lab-produced aligners. These orthodontic technologies were also considered as mandatory in orthodontic postgraduate programs. CAD/CAM technologies appeared to be least important, and their training may be arranged as short course training. There was no significant influence of training locations on the necessity of all orthodontic technologies (P > 0.05), except CBCT. Self-perceived importance and confidence in all technologies were found to have significant positive correlations (P < 0.05), except teledentistry and in-office aligners. CONCLUSION: Orthodontic technologies were perceived as important in clinical workflow. Intraoral Scanners, CBCT, digital treatment planning software, lab-produced aligners, and digital modeling software appeared to be necessary for clinical practice and should be considered for orthodontic postgraduate programs, while other technologies may be arranged as short course training. Further research should investigate how to arrange and organize training sessions in orthodontic postgraduate programs.