Feasibility, Challenges, and Benefits of Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System Implementation: Results from a Multicenter Quasi-Experimental Study
1
Issued Date
2022-03-01
Resource Type
eISSN
20796382
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85126543483
Journal Title
Antibiotics
Volume
11
Issue
3
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Antibiotics Vol.11 No.3 (2022)
Suggested Citation
Sirijatuphat R., Chayangsu S., Srisompong J., Ruangkriengsin D., Thamlikitkul V., Tiengrim S., Wangchinda W., Koomanachai P., Rattanaumpawan P. Feasibility, Challenges, and Benefits of Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System Implementation: Results from a Multicenter Quasi-Experimental Study. Antibiotics Vol.11 No.3 (2022). doi:10.3390/antibiotics11030348 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/83801
Title
Feasibility, Challenges, and Benefits of Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System Implementation: Results from a Multicenter Quasi-Experimental Study
Author's Affiliation
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
The Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS) is one of the pillars of the global action plan on antimicrobial resistance launched by the World Health Organization in 2015. This study was conducted to determine the feasibility and benefits of GLASS as a component of antimicrobial stewardship strategies in three provincial hospitals in Thailand. Data on the types of bacteria isolated and their antibiotic susceptibility during January–December 2019 and January–April 2020 were retrieved from the microbiology laboratory of each participating hospital. Laboratory-based antibiograms from 2019 and GLASS-based antibiograms from 2020 were created and compared. A total of 14,877 and 3,580 bacterial isolates were obtained during January–December 2019 and January–April 2020, respectively. The common bacteria isolated in both periods were Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus. Hospital-acquired infection (HAI)-related bacteria were observed in 59.0%, whereas community-acquired infection (CAI)-related bacteria were observed in 41.0% of isolates. Antibiotic resistance in CAIs was high and may have been related to the misclassification of colonized bacteria as true pathogens and HAIs as CAIs. The results of this study on AMR surveillance using GLASS methodology may not be valid owing to several inadequate data collec-tions and the problem of specimen contamination. Given these considerations, related personnel should receive additional training on the best practices in specimen collection and the management of AMR surveillance data using the GLASS approach.