Turkey's foreign policy dilemma : balancing zero problems with neighbors and humanitarian intervention in the case of Syrian crisis
5
item.page.dc.date.issued
2016
item.page.dc.date.copyright
2016
item.page.dc.type
item.page.dc.language.iso
eng
item.page.dc.format.mimetype
application/pdf
item.page.dc.format.extent
vii, 118 leaves
item.page.dcterms.accessRights
open access
item.page.dc.rights
ผลงานนี้เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของมหาวิทยาลัยมหิดล ขอสงวนไว้สำหรับเพื่อการศึกษาเท่านั้น ต้องอ้างอิงแหล่งที่มา ห้ามดัดแปลงเนื้อหา และห้ามนำไปใช้เพื่อการค้า
item.page.dc.rights.holder
Mahidol University
item.page.dc.identifier.citation
Thesis (M.A. (Human Rights))--Mahidol University, 2016
punsarn.item.page.citation
Demirci, Mustafa Burak Turkey's foreign policy dilemma : balancing zero problems with neighbors and humanitarian intervention in the case of Syrian crisis. Thesis (M.A. (Human Rights))--Mahidol University, 2016. Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/108462
item.page.dc.title
Turkey's foreign policy dilemma : balancing zero problems with neighbors and humanitarian intervention in the case of Syrian crisis
item.page.dc.contributor.author
item.page.dc.contributor.advisor
item.page.dc.description.abstract
Turkish Foreign Policy was challenged first by the Arab Spring and then by the Syrian crisis. This thesis examined how the Syrian Crisis affected the Turkish Foreign Policy through its humanitarian and human rights dimensions. It aimed to analyze the Zero Problem With Neighbors - ZPWN and its compatibility with the exigencies of the Syrian Crisis through the humanitarian intervention lenses. The theories of liberalism and realism were used to critically study the humanitarian intervention in the Turkish Foreign Policy through documentary research as well as interviews with humanitarian workers and the policy makers identified, whilst applying an analytic and interpretative approach in data analysis. This thesis only covered the period between 2011, when the Syrian Crisis began until 2013. With the background study of Turkish foreign policy during the Arab Spring, it was revealed that even though ZPWN was based on non-interventionism, crises like Libya and then Syria demanded that Turkey should have intervened and protected its self-interests. It was clear that finally, the political and economic interests and the realist perspective of the Turkish Foreign policy triumphed. The ZPWN policy introduced as the one and only foreign policy of the Turkish state had failed to answer all the needs and demands of Turkish foreign policy agenda when challenged by the crisis. The ZPWN policy was volatile as realist and liberal aspects challenged each other. Turkish foreign policy makers shifted from one to another in different circumstances. It was also found that whilst humanitarianism and human rights seemed to be high in the Turkish foreign policy agenda, they were not the determining factors of interventions. This thesis argued that self-interests were still pre-dominant in the Turkish Foreign Policy and that interests prevented the Turkish state to play a constructive role in the Syrian crisis. The Turkish self-interests, the failure of the international community to properly intervene, the competition between maj
item.page.dc.description
Human Rights (Mahidol University 2016)
item.page.thesis.degree.name
Master of Arts
item.page.thesis.degree.level
Master's degree
item.page.thesis.degree.department
Institute of Human Rights and Peace Studies
item.page.thesis.degree.discipline
Human Rights
item.page.thesis.degree.grantor
Mahidol University