An electrochemical paper-based analytical sensor for one-step latex protein detection
Issued Date
2022-03-07
Resource Type
ISSN
00032654
eISSN
13645528
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85125551505
Pubmed ID
35166279
Journal Title
Analyst
Volume
147
Issue
5
Start Page
932
End Page
939
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Analyst Vol.147 No.5 (2022) , 932-939
Suggested Citation
Mettakoonpitak J., Junkong P., Saenonphut A., Kwamman T., Siripinyanond A., Henry C.S. An electrochemical paper-based analytical sensor for one-step latex protein detection. Analyst Vol.147 No.5 (2022) , 932-939. 939. doi:10.1039/d1an02067f Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/83796
Title
An electrochemical paper-based analytical sensor for one-step latex protein detection
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Exposure to natural rubber latex (NRL) can result in sensitivity to NRL protein with resulting allergic reactions. Low-cost, portable, simple, sensitive analytical tools for NRL protein measurements are needed for rapid and accurate assessments of allergenic risks at the point-of-care (POC) instead of using traditional methods that require large and expensive instruments, long-Time analysis, and complex sample preparation steps. Here, an electrochemical paper-based analytical device (ePAD) is presented by combining sample preparation and electrochemical detection within a single device to offer a one-step NRL analysis. The lack of antibodies and/or enzymes against NRL makes POC analysis difficult. In this work, detection is based on electrochemical measurement of the remaining Cu after in situ protein complexation instead of more complex biological assays for the first time. Graphene screen-printed electrodes modified with 1,10-phenanthroline and Nafion were used in the ePAD to improve Cu signal 18-fold relative to unmodified carbon screen-printed electrodes. The optimum parameters including 1,10-phenanthroline concentration, reaction time between Cu and protein, and the starting Cu concentration were 5% w/v, 1 min, and 600 μg mL-1, respectively. In addition to short analysis time (4 min), the system selectivity indicated no other interfering species affecting protein detection. The proposed ePAD achieved an LOD of 3.0 mg dL-1 and a linear range of 10.0-200.0 mg dL-1. Finally, the proposed sensors were applied for NRL protein detection and the results were not significantly different from the traditional Lowry method at 95% confidence. This journal is