Willingness-to-pay in physical activity: how much older adults value the community-wide initiatives programs?
Issued Date
2023-01-01
Resource Type
eISSN
22962565
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85176758262
Journal Title
Frontiers in Public Health
Volume
11
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Frontiers in Public Health Vol.11 (2023)
Suggested Citation
Somta S., Völker M., Widyastari D.A., Mysook S., Wongsingha N., Potharin D., Katewongsa P. Willingness-to-pay in physical activity: how much older adults value the community-wide initiatives programs?. Frontiers in Public Health Vol.11 (2023). doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1282877 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/91158
Title
Willingness-to-pay in physical activity: how much older adults value the community-wide initiatives programs?
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have shown insufficient physical activity (PA) as a significant global health concern and a major risk factor for non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Community-wide initiatives in physical activity (CWIPA) is considered as a best-buy for Community-wide initiatives in physical activity (CWIPA) is considered as a best-buy for NCDs prevention. However, assessment regarding resource allocation and cost-effectiveness of existing programs is lacking. This study investigated local residents’ willingness-to-pay (WTP) for community PA programs in Southern Thailand. Methods: The contingent valuation method (CVM) using the payment card approach was employed to elicit the WTP of 472 residents aged 45 years and over in selected provinces in which community PA programs had been implemented. Respondents were asked to indicate their WTP for the continuous offering of free CWIPA by choosing how much they were willing to pay from eight bid-value options, payable through their monthly electricity bill. Results: The mean WTP of Thai older adults was found to be 72 baht/month ($2/month) or 868 baht/year ($25/year). This indicated the maximum amount an older person was willing to pay for any community-based PA program. More than half the sample (54.2%) chose zero as their answer, while there was a fairly large variation in other levels of WTP. The WTP was lower among older respondents and those who resided in rural areas but was higher among those with a history of participation in an organized PA program. Conclusion: The level of WTP can be interpreted as an indicator of community satisfaction with CWIPA. That finding can be used as evidence for the government and policy makers in allocating resources and designing future CWIPA. A variety of organized PA programs should be offered to all community members to ensure inclusivity and also to provide equal access for senior citizens.