Immunogenicity and safety of tixagevimab-cilgavimab for COVID-19 pre-exposure prophylaxis in immunocompromised 20 to <40 kg children and adolescents: A pilot, prospective, open-labeled study

dc.contributor.authorBuaboonnam J.
dc.contributor.authorRungmaitree S.
dc.contributor.authorPiyaphanee N.
dc.contributor.authorCharuvanij S.
dc.contributor.authorPitisuttithum O.
dc.contributor.authorCopeland K.
dc.contributor.authorPheerapanyawaranun C.
dc.contributor.authorJansarikit L.
dc.contributor.authorNiyomnaitham S.
dc.contributor.authorChokephaibulkit K.
dc.contributor.correspondenceBuaboonnam J.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-02T18:15:12Z
dc.date.available2024-12-02T18:15:12Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractWe evaluated the immunogenicity of 300 mg Tixagevimab-Cilgavimab in immunocompromised children and adolescents who weighed 20 to >40 kg. Six to 18-year-old participants were divided into two groups by body weight and received 300 mg (20 to <40 kg) and 600 mg (≥40 kg) Tixagevimab-Cilgavimab, respectively. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain IgG concentrations and pseudovirus neutralizing antibody (NAb) titers were measured at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after administration and compared with reference data from healthy Thai children at 2 weeks after three BNT162b2 vaccinations. Of 59 participants, 49.2% were female, with a median (IQR) age of 12 (9, 15) years; 16 (27.1%) had cancer. NAb titers (95% CI) for the ancestral Wuhan strain were comparatively high for both dosing regimens (16363.2 [13765.9, 19450.5] vs 17768.3 [15539.5, 20316.9] in 20 to <40 kg and ≥40 kg participants, respectively) and significantly higher than reference titers (P < 0.001 for both). NAb titers for Omicron BA.4/5 were on par with the reference for both dosing regimens. Adverse events were mild, well tolerated, and slightly more prevalent in ≥40 kg participants who received full-dose Tixagevimab–Cilgavimab. Minimal waning in anti-RBD IgG concentrations, comparable to the reference, was observed at 12 and 24 weeks after Tixagevimab-Cilgavimab administration for both regimens. We concluded that half-dose Tixagevimab-Cilgavimab in 20 to <40 kg participants generated equivalent antibodies to standard doses in ≥40 kg participants and significantly higher antibodies than three-dose BNT162b2 vaccination. Further study of monoclonal long-acting antibodies in larger cohorts and <6-year-old children are warranted.
dc.identifier.citationHuman Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics Vol.20 No.1 (2024)
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/21645515.2024.2428011
dc.identifier.eissn2164554X
dc.identifier.issn21645515
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85210071402
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/102239
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiology
dc.titleImmunogenicity and safety of tixagevimab-cilgavimab for COVID-19 pre-exposure prophylaxis in immunocompromised 20 to &lt;40 kg children and adolescents: A pilot, prospective, open-labeled study
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85210071402&origin=inward
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.titleHuman Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics
oaire.citation.volume20
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital
oairecerif.author.affiliationAstraZeneca

Files

Collections