Care in emergencies and disasters: Can it be person-centered?
Issued Date
2024-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
07383991
eISSN
18735134
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85175527829
Journal Title
Patient Education and Counseling
Volume
118
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Patient Education and Counseling Vol.118 (2024)
Suggested Citation
Khorram-Manesh A., Gray L., Goniewicz K., Cocco A., Ranse J., Phattharapornjaroen P., Achour N., Sørensen J., Peyravi M., Hertelendy A.J., Kupietz K., Bergholtz J., Carlström E. Care in emergencies and disasters: Can it be person-centered?. Patient Education and Counseling Vol.118 (2024). doi:10.1016/j.pec.2023.108046 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/90998
Title
Care in emergencies and disasters: Can it be person-centered?
Author's Affiliation
Polish Air Force University
Menzies Health Institute Queensland
Health Human Resources Research Center (SUMS)
Florida International University College of Business
Massey University Wellington
University of South-Eastern Norway
Griffith University
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Sahlgrenska Akademin
Western Sydney University
University of Otago
Göteborgs Universitet
Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
Anglia Ruskin University
Elizabeth City State University
Rare Diseases Sweden
Menzies Health Institute Queensland
Health Human Resources Research Center (SUMS)
Florida International University College of Business
Massey University Wellington
University of South-Eastern Norway
Griffith University
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Sahlgrenska Akademin
Western Sydney University
University of Otago
Göteborgs Universitet
Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
Anglia Ruskin University
Elizabeth City State University
Rare Diseases Sweden
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Objectives: While person-/patient-centered care aims to influence policymakers’ rules and regulations to improve the care of individuals worldwide, exploration of the concept in the context of disaster and public health emergencies as an alternative ethical approach is lacking. This study aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the advantages and challenges of diverse ethical approaches in emergencies, to improve patient care. Methods: A survey, created after several rounds of Delphi methodology, with 22 statements, was applied to 39 participants from nine different countries. The questionnaire's results, including participants’ comments, were analyzed. Results: The results show that practitioners chose to use a combination of diverse ethical approaches in managing victims of disasters and public health emergencies. Conclusion: The selection of an approach is context- and situation-dependent and seems to primarily respond to the nature of underlying etiology, creating a possibility to use diverse approaches to offer individualized care on a later occasion and when a flexible surge capacity is available. Practice Implications: The outcomes of this study will enhance the future ethical discussion in person/patient-centered care during situations with limited resources and help to develop necessary ethical and educational guidelines.