Staging of non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma with PET/CT
| dc.contributor.author | Cao C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Treechairusame T. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wu Y. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shamseddine A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu Y. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Riaz N. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gelblum D.Y. | |
| dc.contributor.author | McBride S.M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kang J.J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Zakeri K.J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tsai C.J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wong R.J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cracchiolo J.R. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cohen M.A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ganly I.A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shah J.P. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ho A.L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wong W.L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dunn L.A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Michel L.S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sherman E.J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lee N.Y. | |
| dc.contributor.correspondence | Cao C. | |
| dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-04-29T18:19:28Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-04-29T18:19:28Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-01-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To evaluate the prognostic accuracy and clinical applicability of the ninth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control (AJCC/UICC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system for non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in the era of [<sup>18</sup>F]-fluorodeoxyglucose ([<sup>18</sup>F] FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 301 patients with NPC treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy at a tertiary academic cancer center from January 1, 2003, to February 28, 2023. The comparison between the ninth edition of the AJCC/UICC TNM (TNM-9) and the eighth edition of the AJCC/UICC TNM (TNM-8) staging systems was performed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: The proportions of patients receiving [<sup>18</sup>F] FDG PET/CT and magnetic resonance imaging as initial workup were 99.3% (299/301) and 96.9% (289/301), respectively. The median follow-up time was 88.1 months (interquartile range (IQR), 51.1–136.8 months). Based on the TNM-9 staging system, the 5-year OS rates of patients with Stage I, II and III were 91.7%, 84.8% and 76.8%, respectively (p = 0.090). The 5-year OS rates of patients with classification N0, N1, N2, and N3 were 92.0%, 87.1%, 77.6% and 79.1%, respectively (p = 0.879). The area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve values of the TNM-9 and TNM-8 were 0.6239 and 0.6678 for OS (p = 0.0003), respectively. Conclusion: The TNM-9 staging system did not exhibit strong overall discrimination between the stage-group classifications for OS of non-metastatic NPC in the [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET era. Key Points: Question Does the newly launched TNM-9 staging system (January 2025) remain valid for non-metastatic NPC in the era of [<sup>18</sup>F] FDG PET/CT? Findings The TNM-9 staging system showed declining 5-year overall survival rates from Stage I to III, with modest overall predictive accuracy for overall survival. Clinical relevance These findings suggest that the TNM-9 staging system has a limited ability to discriminate overall survival between stage groups in non-metastatic NPC in the [<sup>18</sup>F] FDG PET/CT era. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | European Radiology (2026) | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00330-026-12537-0 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 14321084 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 09387994 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 42009870 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105036322369 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/116390 | |
| dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | |
| dc.subject | Medicine | |
| dc.title | Staging of non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma with PET/CT | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105036322369&origin=inward | |
| oaire.citation.title | European Radiology | |
| oairecerif.author.affiliation | Chinese Academy of Sciences | |
| oairecerif.author.affiliation | Yale School of Medicine | |
| oairecerif.author.affiliation | Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center | |
| oairecerif.author.affiliation | Princess Margaret Cancer Centre | |
| oairecerif.author.affiliation | Siriraj Hospital |
