Information Recovery Under Partial Observation: A Methodological Analysis of Multi-Informant Questionnaire Data

Abstract

This study examines information recovery under structured partial observation in multi-informant questionnaire systems. Rather than predicting an external ground truth, we evaluate the recoverability of an operational full-information decision rulewhen only partial informant views are available. In the empirical SNAP-IV calibration study, this reference is intentionally defined as a deterministic function of the combined informant views, so the combined-view result is treated only as an oracle-style ceiling and the substantive analysis concerns how single-view recovery degrades when one informant is withheld. To examine whether a similar qualitative pattern extends beyond this calibration setting, we additionally evaluate a latent-state simulation in which the reference decision is generated from an unobserved latent state and informant views are noisy observations. Across both settings, single-view recoverability declines as inter-rater disagreement increases, whereas combined-view representations remain more stable. In the empirical study, combined-view models achieved near-ceiling recovery performance (e.g., 90.9% for Logistic Regression and 91.3% for MLP), while Teacher-only recovery dropped from approximately 78% to 63% under higher disagreement ( (Formula presented.), Cohen’s (Formula presented.) ). Additional non-learned single-rater score-threshold baselines exhibited the same qualitative degradation pattern, indicating that the effect is not specific to fitted machine learning models. Importantly, this work is methodological: it does not propose new learning algorithms or clinical prediction models, but instead presents a conceptual–methodological framework, together with model-agnostic recoverability quantities, for quantifying missing-view information loss under incomplete, heterogeneous observations.