Prospective multicenter real-world outcomes of Suction Technology Utility in Mini-PCNL Study (STUMPS) in modern-day practice: formulation of the global STUMPS registry on behalf of the endourology section of the European Association of Urology and the suction mini-PCNL collaborative study group
5
Issued Date
2025-12-01
Resource Type
ISSN
07244983
eISSN
14338726
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105005078899
Journal Title
World Journal of Urology
Volume
43
Issue
1
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
World Journal of Urology Vol.43 No.1 (2025)
Suggested Citation
Gauhar V., Castellani D., Kalathia J., Mehta A., Gadzhiev N., Malkhasyan V., Kumar N., Kalbit R.H., Gorgotsky I., Gokce M.i., Laymon M., Inoue T., Tak G.R., Baker A., Dholaria P., Chawla A., Beltrán-Suárez E., Mahajan A., Fong K.Y., Yuen S.K.K., Tan K., Omar M., Petkova K., Taguchi K., Ketsuwan C., Lakmichi M.A., Palaniappan S., Tanidir Y., Akdogan N., Cepeda M., Martov A., Tokhtiyev Z., Tzelves L., Skolarikos A., Acuña E., Zawadzki M., Kamal W., Lopes L.G., Gorelov D., Agrawal M.S., Vaddi C.M., Somani B.K., Herrmann T.R.W. Prospective multicenter real-world outcomes of Suction Technology Utility in Mini-PCNL Study (STUMPS) in modern-day practice: formulation of the global STUMPS registry on behalf of the endourology section of the European Association of Urology and the suction mini-PCNL collaborative study group. World Journal of Urology Vol.43 No.1 (2025). doi:10.1007/s00345-025-05656-8 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/110323
Title
Prospective multicenter real-world outcomes of Suction Technology Utility in Mini-PCNL Study (STUMPS) in modern-day practice: formulation of the global STUMPS registry on behalf of the endourology section of the European Association of Urology and the suction mini-PCNL collaborative study group
Author(s)
Gauhar V.
Castellani D.
Kalathia J.
Mehta A.
Gadzhiev N.
Malkhasyan V.
Kumar N.
Kalbit R.H.
Gorgotsky I.
Gokce M.i.
Laymon M.
Inoue T.
Tak G.R.
Baker A.
Dholaria P.
Chawla A.
Beltrán-Suárez E.
Mahajan A.
Fong K.Y.
Yuen S.K.K.
Tan K.
Omar M.
Petkova K.
Taguchi K.
Ketsuwan C.
Lakmichi M.A.
Palaniappan S.
Tanidir Y.
Akdogan N.
Cepeda M.
Martov A.
Tokhtiyev Z.
Tzelves L.
Skolarikos A.
Acuña E.
Zawadzki M.
Kamal W.
Lopes L.G.
Gorelov D.
Agrawal M.S.
Vaddi C.M.
Somani B.K.
Herrmann T.R.W.
Castellani D.
Kalathia J.
Mehta A.
Gadzhiev N.
Malkhasyan V.
Kumar N.
Kalbit R.H.
Gorgotsky I.
Gokce M.i.
Laymon M.
Inoue T.
Tak G.R.
Baker A.
Dholaria P.
Chawla A.
Beltrán-Suárez E.
Mahajan A.
Fong K.Y.
Yuen S.K.K.
Tan K.
Omar M.
Petkova K.
Taguchi K.
Ketsuwan C.
Lakmichi M.A.
Palaniappan S.
Tanidir Y.
Akdogan N.
Cepeda M.
Martov A.
Tokhtiyev Z.
Tzelves L.
Skolarikos A.
Acuña E.
Zawadzki M.
Kamal W.
Lopes L.G.
Gorelov D.
Agrawal M.S.
Vaddi C.M.
Somani B.K.
Herrmann T.R.W.
Author's Affiliation
European Association of Urology
Sengkang General Hospital
Ramathibodi Hospital
Saint-Petersburg State University Hospital
Military Medical Academy, Sofia
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona
Kantonsspital Frauenfeld
Hamad Medical Corporation
Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Hannover Medical School
Menoufia University
MGM Medical College, Aurangabad
Kasturba Medical College, Manipal
Hospital Universitario Río Hortega
Ankara Üniversitesi
Kobe University
CHU Mohammed-VI
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
Faculty of Medicine
King Fahd General Hospital
Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Pavlov University
Çukurova Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi
Stellenbosch University
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Institution Hospital Provincial de Ovalle
Fortune Urology Clinic
Pushpanjali Hospital & Research Centre
Preeti Urology and Kidney Hospital
Veterans Memorial Medical Center
Ng Teng Fong General Hospital
Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology
Ford Hospital
St. Anna Hospital
B T Savani Kidney Hospital
FMBA of Russia
Medicana Ataşehir Hospital
Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte
Botkin Hospital
Sengkang General Hospital
Ramathibodi Hospital
Saint-Petersburg State University Hospital
Military Medical Academy, Sofia
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona
Kantonsspital Frauenfeld
Hamad Medical Corporation
Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Hannover Medical School
Menoufia University
MGM Medical College, Aurangabad
Kasturba Medical College, Manipal
Hospital Universitario Río Hortega
Ankara Üniversitesi
Kobe University
CHU Mohammed-VI
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
Faculty of Medicine
King Fahd General Hospital
Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Pavlov University
Çukurova Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi
Stellenbosch University
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Institution Hospital Provincial de Ovalle
Fortune Urology Clinic
Pushpanjali Hospital & Research Centre
Preeti Urology and Kidney Hospital
Veterans Memorial Medical Center
Ng Teng Fong General Hospital
Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology
Ford Hospital
St. Anna Hospital
B T Savani Kidney Hospital
FMBA of Russia
Medicana Ataşehir Hospital
Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte
Botkin Hospital
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Purpose: To present outcomes of a registry to understand the practice patterns, resource utilization, and nuances of suction mini-percutaneous nephron lithotripsy (SM-PCNL). Methods: Data from 30 centers in 21 countries were prospectively collected (March–November 2024). SM-PCNL was defined as PCNL using a suction nephrostomy sheath of size 14–22 Fr. with any lithotripsy device. There were no instructions on how to perform the surgical procedure. Stone features and stone-free status were assessed using an unenhanced CT scan. Data are presented as median/interquartile range and frequency/proportion. Results: 1707 patients were included and 42.4% of them were males. Most were first-time stone formers. Median age was 50 years. Median stone volume was 1700 mm3. Surgery was commonly performed using a single access tract (92.9%) and in supine position (56.5%). The fluoroscopy-only puncture was used as the most common access (70.7%), followed by the combination of fluoroscopy and ultrasound (25.1%). Median operation time was 45 min. The most common sheath was Clearpetra (27.8%). Thulium fiber laser was the most frequent energy used (26.2%). A tubeless procedure with a stent was employed in 47.0% of cases. Most common complications were fever managed by observation (7.3%), fever requiring antibiotics (3.3%), blood transfusion (1.1%), and sepsis (0.2%). Median hospitalization was 3 days. 30-day CT scan showed zero fragments in 82.4% of patients. Reintervention was performed in 2.6% of cases. Conclusions: This registry outlines the various equipment, peri-operative strategies, complications, and outcomes of SM-PCNL performed in real-world practice, providing valuable data on the nuances of performing such surgery.
