Corrigendum to “Higher versus lower oxygenation strategies in the general intensive care unit population: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials” [Journal of Critical Care, volume 72(2022) 154151](S0883944122001800)(10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154151)
van der Wal L.I., Grim C.C.A., van Westerloo D.J., Schultz M.J., de Jonge E., Helmerhorst H.J.F. Corrigendum to “Higher versus lower oxygenation strategies in the general intensive care unit population: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials” [Journal of Critical Care, volume 72(2022) 154151](S0883944122001800)(10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154151). Journal of Critical Care Vol.74 (2023). doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154245 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/82345
Title
Corrigendum to “Higher versus lower oxygenation strategies in the general intensive care unit population: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials” [Journal of Critical Care, volume 72(2022) 154151](S0883944122001800)(10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154151)
The authors regret errors were present in the published article. The axes of the forest plot on support free days at day 28 (Fig. 4) were accidentally swapped. Also under 1.3.1 Ventilator-free, no totals were filled out for Gelissen et al. under Higher targets, which should be 195. This changes the total mean difference to 0.19 [−0.40, 0.78]. The updated Fig. 4 should read as below. In addition, the legends of Fig. 6 included a typing error. The last sentence of the legends should read: ‘An OR < 1 is beneficial to the lower oxygenation group.’ The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.[Formula presented]
