Outcomes of Microscopic Residual Tumor after Curative-Intent Surgery in Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction

dc.contributor.authorNampoolsuksan C.
dc.contributor.authorBhocksombud K.
dc.contributor.authorParakonthun T.
dc.contributor.authorSuwatthanarak T.
dc.contributor.authorTawantanakorn T.
dc.contributor.authorSrisuworanan N.
dc.contributor.authorTaweerutchana V.
dc.contributor.authorTrakarnsanga A.
dc.contributor.authorPhalanusitthepha C.
dc.contributor.authorSwangsri J.
dc.contributor.authorAkaraviputh T.
dc.contributor.authorMethasate A.
dc.contributor.authorChinswangwatanakul V.
dc.contributor.correspondenceNampoolsuksan C.
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-12T18:21:43Z
dc.date.available2024-11-12T18:21:43Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: Radical surgery is the mainstay treatment for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. The presence of microscopic residual tumor tissue after curative-intent surgery is associated with recurrence. This study compared the outcomes of patients with microscopic residual tumor (Residual+ group) and those without microscopic residual tumor (Residual- group). Material and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 71 patients with adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction who underwent curative-intent surgery between January 2005 and August 2018. We evaluated the clinical and pathological characteristics and compared recurrences, rates and patterns, between groups. Five-year overall survival (OS) and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: Nineteen (26.8%) patients had microscopic residual tumors, consisting of 8 (11.3%) with positive resection margins, 10 (14.0%) with malignant cells from peritoneal washing fluid cytology, and 1 (1.4%) with both. The median OS in the Residual- group was significantly better than that in the Residual+ group (31.3 vs 11.9 months, P = 0.003). The Residual- group had better 5-year OS (26.2% vs 11.9%, P = 0.015) and 3-year DFS (24.4% vs 9.8%, P = 0.003) than the Residual+ group. During follow-up period, 48% of the patients in the Residual+ group experienced recurrent disease, with a median follow-up time at 7.7 months. Distant metastasis was the most common site of recurrence. Conclusion: Microscopic residual tumor after resection is associated with poorer survival outcomes and higher recurrence rates. Curative surgery should aim to achieve R0 resection in all patients with resectable adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction.
dc.identifier.citationSiriraj Medical Journal Vol.76 No.11 (2024) , 758-765
dc.identifier.doi10.33192/smj.v76i11.269480
dc.identifier.eissn22288082
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85208228408
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/101977
dc.rights.holderSCOPUS
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleOutcomes of Microscopic Residual Tumor after Curative-Intent Surgery in Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction
dc.typeArticle
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85208228408&origin=inward
oaire.citation.endPage765
oaire.citation.issue11
oaire.citation.startPage758
oaire.citation.titleSiriraj Medical Journal
oaire.citation.volume76
oairecerif.author.affiliationSiriraj Hospital

Files

Collections